Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reduce allocations when binding string/time args #1293

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

charlievieth
Copy link
Contributor

This commit reduces the number of allocations required to bind args by eliminating string to byte slice conversions for string and time.Time types and by only checking for bind parameters if any of the driver.NamedValue args are named.

goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3
cpu: Apple M1 Max
                           │  b.10.txt   │             x7.10.txt              │
                           │   sec/op    │   sec/op     vs base               │
CustomFunctions-10           3.230µ ± 1%   3.253µ ± 1%  +0.73% (p=0.022 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkExec-10       1.240µ ± 0%   1.231µ ± 1%       ~ (p=0.210 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkQuery-10      3.892µ ± 1%   3.854µ ± 1%  -0.96% (p=0.009 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkParams-10     4.203µ ± 1%   4.163µ ± 1%  -0.94% (p=0.011 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkStmt-10       2.814µ ± 1%   2.763µ ± 1%  -1.81% (p=0.000 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkRows-10       131.2µ ± 1%   130.7µ ± 0%  -0.40% (p=0.035 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkStmtRows-10   131.0µ ± 1%   128.9µ ± 1%  -1.59% (p=0.043 n=10)
geomean                      8.485µ        8.416µ       -0.82%

                           │   b.10.txt   │               x7.10.txt                │
                           │     B/op     │     B/op      vs base                  │
CustomFunctions-10             568.0 ± 0%     568.0 ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkExec-10         128.0 ± 0%     128.0 ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkQuery-10        688.0 ± 0%     688.0 ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkParams-10      1104.0 ± 0%    1000.0 ± 0%   -9.42% (p=0.000 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkStmt-10         920.0 ± 0%     816.0 ± 0%  -11.30% (p=0.000 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkRows-10       9.305Ki ± 0%   9.305Ki ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkStmtRows-10   9.289Ki ± 0%   9.289Ki ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
geomean                      1.215Ki        1.177Ki        -3.08%
¹ all samples are equal

                           │  b.10.txt  │              x7.10.txt              │
                           │ allocs/op  │ allocs/op   vs base                 │
CustomFunctions-10           18.00 ± 0%   18.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkExec-10       7.000 ± 0%   7.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkQuery-10      23.00 ± 0%   23.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkParams-10     27.00 ± 0%   25.00 ± 0%  -7.41% (p=0.000 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkStmt-10       25.00 ± 0%   23.00 ± 0%  -8.00% (p=0.000 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkRows-10       525.0 ± 0%   525.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkStmtRows-10   524.0 ± 0%   524.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
geomean                      47.41        46.33       -2.26%
¹ all samples are equal

@charlievieth
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note: this PR includes #1294 since it fixes the CIFuzz and macOS tests.

This commit reduces the number of allocations required to bind args by
eliminating string to byte slice conversions for string and time.Time
types and by only checking for bind parameters if any of the
driver.NamedValue args are named.

goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3
cpu: Apple M1 Max
                           │  b.10.txt   │             x7.10.txt              │
                           │   sec/op    │   sec/op     vs base               │
CustomFunctions-10           3.230µ ± 1%   3.253µ ± 1%  +0.73% (p=0.022 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkExec-10       1.240µ ± 0%   1.231µ ± 1%       ~ (p=0.210 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkQuery-10      3.892µ ± 1%   3.854µ ± 1%  -0.96% (p=0.009 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkParams-10     4.203µ ± 1%   4.163µ ± 1%  -0.94% (p=0.011 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkStmt-10       2.814µ ± 1%   2.763µ ± 1%  -1.81% (p=0.000 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkRows-10       131.2µ ± 1%   130.7µ ± 0%  -0.40% (p=0.035 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkStmtRows-10   131.0µ ± 1%   128.9µ ± 1%  -1.59% (p=0.043 n=10)
geomean                      8.485µ        8.416µ       -0.82%

                           │   b.10.txt   │               x7.10.txt                │
                           │     B/op     │     B/op      vs base                  │
CustomFunctions-10             568.0 ± 0%     568.0 ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkExec-10         128.0 ± 0%     128.0 ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkQuery-10        688.0 ± 0%     688.0 ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkParams-10      1104.0 ± 0%    1000.0 ± 0%   -9.42% (p=0.000 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkStmt-10         920.0 ± 0%     816.0 ± 0%  -11.30% (p=0.000 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkRows-10       9.305Ki ± 0%   9.305Ki ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkStmtRows-10   9.289Ki ± 0%   9.289Ki ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
geomean                      1.215Ki        1.177Ki        -3.08%
¹ all samples are equal

                           │  b.10.txt  │              x7.10.txt              │
                           │ allocs/op  │ allocs/op   vs base                 │
CustomFunctions-10           18.00 ± 0%   18.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkExec-10       7.000 ± 0%   7.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkQuery-10      23.00 ± 0%   23.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkParams-10     27.00 ± 0%   25.00 ± 0%  -7.41% (p=0.000 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkStmt-10       25.00 ± 0%   23.00 ± 0%  -8.00% (p=0.000 n=10)
Suite/BenchmarkRows-10       525.0 ± 0%   525.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Suite/BenchmarkStmtRows-10   524.0 ± 0%   524.0 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
geomean                      47.41        46.33       -2.26%
¹ all samples are equal
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant