Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Amendments to the "new literal profile" PR #387

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

gouttegd
Copy link
Contributor

@gouttegd gouttegd commented Aug 6, 2024

This PR amends the #384 PR to:

  • describe what literal mappings are and how they should be used;
  • remove the old page about “SSSOM profiles”, which is no longer relevant (literal mappings are not a “profile”);
  • attempt to better describe rdfs literal in the built-in schema documentation.

Remove the old page about the "literal profile" (which no longer
exists). Instead, add a section to the introductory page about the model
to explain what literal mappings are and how to use them.
Attempt to clarify the in-schema description of the `rdfs literal`
value. Also explicitly state that it can only be used to describe the
subject and/or the object, but not the predicate.
@gouttegd gouttegd changed the title New literal profile additions 2 Amendments to the "new literal profile" PR Aug 6, 2024
@gouttegd gouttegd self-assigned this Aug 6, 2024
@gouttegd gouttegd requested a review from matentzn August 6, 2024 18:48
Copy link
Collaborator

@matentzn matentzn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fantastic, please merge!

@gouttegd gouttegd merged commit 2e33756 into new-literal-profile Aug 6, 2024
2 checks passed
@gouttegd gouttegd deleted the new-literal-profile-additions-2 branch August 6, 2024 20:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants