Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes from GToolkit #348

Open
wants to merge 32 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JurajKubelka
Copy link
Contributor

Sync with GToolkit as a part of the feenkcom/gtoolkit#3564.

JurajKubelka and others added 30 commits January 5, 2022 15:24
* commit '42893f8b3ec54f995352611fe20284539eee05c6':
  remove a class reference that resides in a package that we do not load in GToolkit
  remove `BaselineOfMagritteForGt`
  add `BaselineOfMagritteForGToolkit`
  move Morphic code into the Morph package
  fix the `Magritte-Pharo7-PlainPharo` name and reference
  add `Magritte-Pharo7-PlainPharo`
  add `BaselineOfMagritteForGt`
  clean package dependencies
# Conflicts:
#	source/BaselineOfMagritte/BaselineOfMagritte.class.st
# Conflicts:
#	source/BaselineOfMagritte/BaselineOfMagritte.class.st
…kit#3371]

- add `MAPropertyChangedAnnouncement`
- currently we support all properties and `MAActionDescription >> #label:` (which stored as an instance variable)
@seandenigris
Copy link
Member

Something looks weird here. The commit list seems to include many that were already resolved - possibly in a conflicting way - during the last sync. I’ll take a better look when at home

@JurajKubelka
Copy link
Contributor Author

I had to resolve several conflicts while merging to the feenk repository. I accepted incoming changes in all cases. I am actually surprised that it claims that MATPropertyOwner >> #whenPropertyChangedSend:to: is not in the upstream repository. At least this is what claims this pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants