reduce daily block range size to 10

[edg-l]

To reduce the timeout chance, daily block running is more a health check, so if it fails due to timeout its pointless

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.66%. Comparing base (4bd59e9) to head (1bbe4f1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #973   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.66%   80.66%           
=======================================
  Files         107      107           
  Lines       29325    29325           
=======================================
  Hits        23656    23656           
  Misses       5669     5669           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmarking results

Benchmark for program factorial_2M

Open benchmarks

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
Cairo-vm (Rust, Cairo 1)	11.220 ± 0.193	10.750	11.478	8.33 ± 0.14
cairo-native (embedded AOT)	3.348 ± 0.013	3.331	3.370	2.49 ± 0.01
cairo-native (embedded JIT using LLVM's ORC Engine)	3.146 ± 0.016	3.119	3.163	2.34 ± 0.01
cairo-native (standalone AOT with -march=native)	1.346 ± 0.001	1.344	1.348	1.00

Benchmark for program fib_2M

Open benchmarks

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
Cairo-vm (Rust, Cairo 1)	10.597 ± 0.321	10.341	11.250	136.56 ± 4.15
cairo-native (embedded AOT)	2.968 ± 0.049	2.901	3.040	38.25 ± 0.64
cairo-native (embedded JIT using LLVM's ORC Engine)	2.733 ± 0.048	2.692	2.858	35.22 ± 0.63
cairo-native (standalone AOT with -march=native)	0.078 ± 0.000	0.077	0.078	1.00

Benchmark for program linear_search

Open benchmarks

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
Cairo-vm (Rust, Cairo 1)	4.317 ± 0.038	4.261	4.367	2199.88 ± 47.36
cairo-native (embedded AOT)	3.024 ± 0.016	3.004	3.054	1541.05 ± 31.29
cairo-native (embedded JIT using LLVM's ORC Engine)	2.924 ± 0.015	2.895	2.942	1489.98 ± 30.22
cairo-native (standalone AOT with -march=native)	0.002 ± 0.000	0.002	0.002	1.00

Benchmark for program logistic_map

Open benchmarks

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
Cairo-vm (Rust, Cairo 1)	4.197 ± 0.016	4.165	4.223	17.28 ± 0.09
cairo-native (embedded AOT)	3.110 ± 0.029	3.079	3.178	12.80 ± 0.13
cairo-native (embedded JIT using LLVM's ORC Engine)	3.031 ± 0.018	3.004	3.059	12.48 ± 0.09
cairo-native (standalone AOT with -march=native)	0.243 ± 0.001	0.242	0.245	1.00

[github-actions]

Benchmark results Main vs HEAD.

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base factorial_2M.cairo (JIT)	3.362 ± 0.057	3.262	3.428	1.00
base factorial_2M.cairo (AOT)	3.564 ± 0.083	3.437	3.691	1.06 ± 0.03
Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
:---	---:	---:	---:	---:
head factorial_2M.cairo (JIT)	3.210 ± 0.028	3.172	3.271	1.00
head factorial_2M.cairo (AOT)	3.395 ± 0.030	3.358	3.447	1.06 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base fib_2M.cairo (JIT)	2.935 ± 0.067	2.830	3.081	1.00
base fib_2M.cairo (AOT)	3.252 ± 0.031	3.218	3.311	1.11 ± 0.03
Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
:---	---:	---:	---:	---:
head fib_2M.cairo (JIT)	2.724 ± 0.022	2.699	2.769	1.00
head fib_2M.cairo (AOT)	2.915 ± 0.012	2.897	2.932	1.07 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search.cairo (JIT)	3.235 ± 0.033	3.174	3.275	1.00
base linear_search.cairo (AOT)	3.345 ± 0.036	3.284	3.412	1.03 ± 0.02
Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
:---	---:	---:	---:	---:
head linear_search.cairo (JIT)	2.938 ± 0.040	2.886	2.998	1.00
head linear_search.cairo (AOT)	3.031 ± 0.029	2.997	3.100	1.03 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base logistic_map.cairo (JIT)	3.368 ± 0.055	3.290	3.451	1.00
base logistic_map.cairo (AOT)	3.490 ± 0.049	3.418	3.585	1.04 ± 0.02
Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
:---	---:	---:	---:	---:
head logistic_map.cairo (JIT)	3.072 ± 0.042	3.002	3.134	1.00
head logistic_map.cairo (AOT)	3.239 ± 0.035	3.204	3.292	1.05 ± 0.02

[JulianGCalderon]

Right now we are running 40 workflows, with 25 blocks each, summing up to a total of 1000 blocks each day. If we reduce the range size, we should also increase the number of workflows so that we run more or less the same amount of blocks.

Also, maybe a range size of 10 to little, maybe we could try with 20 and see if it finishes in time.

[FrancoGiachetta]

I would say it's preferable to have more blocks and leave it to 10 to be sure it won't fail. Looking at the number of transactions that fail, I think 10 blocks range should have us covered. What do you think?

[JulianGCalderon]

@FrancoGiachetta 10 blocks will probably work, but if it fails with 20 (or 15), we could make another PR lowering it a bit more, right? There is a limit to the amount of jobs that can be run in a workflow, so there is a benefit on trying to find the maximum range size that will run all blocks, just in case later on we want to increase the size of the daily run.

[FrancoGiachetta]

If I'm not mistaken, the limit of workers is 256. But yeah, we could definitely give it a try.