-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow to register all pods and their associated PTR record #4782
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Add two new options: - --ignore-non-host-network-pods - --pod-source-domain Combined toghether, they can be used to register the IPs of all pods with their associated PTR record.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Welcome @foyerunix! |
Hi @foyerunix. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Hello,
We have deployed multiples Kubernetes clusters on-premise. Our cluster use Cilium CNI with SNAT disabled. This mean the pods traffic will exit the cluster with their pod IP and not with the node IP (the pod IPs are then correctly routed back to Kubernetes).
This is useful for us as a SRE team as we can track easily which pod is making which connection.
The drawback is that we still have to check on Kubernetes the pod which is associated with a particular IP.
As external-dns already implemented the pod source and the creation of PTR record, I thought it would be easy to register the pods PTR record in the DNS. But the pod source seem to has been made for a very precise use case relating to kops.
I therefore implemented two new options for our use case:
The first let us create DNS records for pods even if they aren't running with host networking enabled.
The second allow us to build a pod FQDN with a default domain even without annotations.
I'm hesitating to combine the two as only one option ("--all-pods-domain" ?) that would then bypass the original intended use case for the pod source. I worry that the combination of the kops use case and mine in the same configuration will lead to an absurd behavior. But what if someone have a legitimate use for this ?
Please can you give me your opinion on the current implementation or if you would want to refactor it in another way.
Best Regards.