Fixed glitch in phase accumulator wrap-around. #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi ynohtna, sorry. Only just saw this. Thanks. I'll have a quick test and update ... phil |
|
No worries, man, I fully understand how easily real life latencies can get stretched out of control. :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey man, just took a quick look at your WaveFlavours project.
Interesting stuff but my eyeball scan saw a small bug in the phase accumulator wrap-around which discards any remainder so I've performed a quick speculative patch.
Note that I haven't compiled this or anything - haven't got the time to setup the necessary modules & environment at present - so please be sure to verify!