-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
botmode: Document /WHO response and PRIVMSG tags #67
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This will result in the module having a weird description when we run mkdescriptions. |
Maybe after bots we could add a . and then start a new sentence? |
weird how? |
|
docs/3/modules/botmode.yml
Outdated
* in their `/WHOIS` response | ||
* in `/WHO` responses | ||
* in PRIVMSGs sent by them, using the `draft/bot` (starting with InspIRCd 3.11) and `inpircd.org/bot` tags |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* in their `/WHOIS` response | |
* in `/WHO` responses | |
* in PRIVMSGs sent by them, using the `draft/bot` (starting with InspIRCd 3.11) and `inpircd.org/bot` tags | |
* In their `/WHOIS` response. | |
* In `/WHO` responses. | |
* In messages using the `bot` and `inspircd.org/bot` tags. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I removed the "in" because "This includes: in their /WHOIS response" sounds weird
This assumes inspircd/inspircd#1910 is merged before the next minor release