Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perltidyrc with minimal amount of changes to code #59

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wchristian
Copy link
Contributor

Based on the recent irc discussion i made a .perltidyrc file which results in the minimum amount of changes i could configure it for.

The bulk of the changes it does is vertical alignment in lines with similar content, and indenting of qw statements. As you go through you'll however also find that it improves some parts of the code to make them more consistent.

Might be worth taking this in, as a one-time thing and asking people who make patches to tidy the code with the included perltidyrc in the future.

If you don't like it, no worry, i won't cry. :)

@frioux
Copy link
Collaborator

frioux commented Dec 14, 2014

I hate that perltidy can't be configured to not align things like that. It just causes a ton of churn.

@frioux frioux force-pushed the master branch 3 times, most recently from 4c30e64 to dcdd4d8 Compare December 14, 2014 08:06
@wchristian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Everyone does, but i guess the situation is as always "patches welcome". :)

@shlomif
Copy link
Collaborator

shlomif commented Nov 30, 2016

Sorry for the late reply, but I'm getting many conflicts when trying to merge it and my git skills are not up-to-the-task. Can you redo this pull req?

@wchristian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Redid it and force-pushed it, please fetch and reset to f7bbd93

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.7%) to 90.769% when pulling f7bbd93 on wchristian:perltidyrc into 042a151 on ingydotnet:master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants