-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 214
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pass pullMerge to getIModelProps which causes extents to be loaded from the database instead of the cached value #7187
Open
nick4598
wants to merge
6
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
nick/refreshextentsafterpullchanges
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ef92ce2
updateProjectExtents on changesetapplied event and add test
nick4598 33f7abd
Merge branch 'master' into nick/refreshextentsafterpullchanges
nick4598 0d5db65
rush change
nick4598 2aaa285
pass "pullMergef" to initializeImodelDb
nick4598 eeab6bb
lint error
nick4598 51ed0c0
run rush extract-api
nick4598 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions
10
common/changes/@itwin/core-backend/nick-refreshextentsafterpullchanges_2024-09-23-18-57.json
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"changes": [ | ||
{ | ||
"packageName": "@itwin/core-backend", | ||
"comment": "pulling a changeset with project extents changes now updates the extents of the opened imodel", | ||
"type": "none" | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"packageName": "@itwin/core-backend" | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are we really just going to use a string literal?
what other possible option is there for this in the future?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also personally wanted to do a boolean "afterPullMerge" or something along those lines that defaults to false because it seems unlikely we'd need to special case anything else. But, affan mentioned that he was working on a Pr to support table conflict handlers which are called before applying changests, after applying changesets, and eventually after calling pullMerge. That was where his suggestion came from. Im not tied to either approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@khanaffan