Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport of Fix typo: correct "infrastruture" to "infrastructure" into v1.10 #36040

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This PR is auto-generated from #35883 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label 1.10-backport.

The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.


This PR addresses a minor typo in the documentation. The word "infrastruture" has been corrected to "infrastructure" to ensure clarity and accuracy.


Overview of commits

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from crw November 18, 2024 23:26
@crw crw marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2024 23:27
@crw crw merged commit 11e0983 into v1.10 Nov 18, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@crw crw deleted the backport/fix/typo-infrastructure/mistakenly-gorgeous-escargot branch November 18, 2024 23:32
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reminder for the merging maintainer: if this is a user-visible change, please update the changelog on the appropriate release branch.

Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants