Adição de um novo método IsValidCompe no arquivo Program.cs #582
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the input validation mechanism for the COMPE code in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
size/M
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
gstraccini
bot
added
the
🚦 awaiting triage
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
examples/dotnet/Program.cs (3)
55-58: Add documentation and null handling.The validation logic is correct but needs documentation and null handling.
Consider this improvement:
+/// <summary> +/// Validates if the provided string is a valid COMPE code. +/// </summary> +/// <param name="compe">The COMPE code to validate.</param> +/// <returns>True if the code is exactly 3 digits; otherwise, false.</returns> private static bool IsValidCompe(string compe) { - return compe.Length == 3 && compe.All(char.IsDigit); + return !string.IsNullOrEmpty(compe) && compe.Length == 3 && compe.All(char.IsDigit); }
Line range hint
132-144: Add input validation to prevent runtime exceptions.There are several critical validation issues in the menu handling:
Convert.ToInt32can throw FormatException- No bounds checking on the option value
- The recursive call to FilterBanks bypasses COMPE validation
Consider this safer implementation:
- Console.Write("1.Listar Todos \t 2.Buscar COMPE: "); - int option = Convert.ToInt32(Console.ReadLine()); + Console.Write("1.Listar Todos \t 2.Buscar COMPE \t 0.Sair: "); + if (!int.TryParse(Console.ReadLine(), out int option) || option < 0 || option > 2) + { + Console.WriteLine("Opção inválida. Pressione qualquer tecla para continuar..."); + Console.ReadKey(); + FilterBanks(compe); + return; + } if (option == 1) { Console.Clear(); Main(); } - if (option == 2) + else if (option == 2) { Console.Clear(); - Console.Write("Buscar COMPE (3 dígitos): "); - compe = Console.ReadLine(); + compe = GetCompeFromUser(); FilterBanks(compe); } + else + { + Environment.Exit(0); + }
Line range hint
132-144: Consider restructuring the navigation flow.The current implementation has architectural concerns:
- Recursive calls in the navigation logic could lead to stack overflow with repeated invalid inputs
- Direct calls to Main() create tight coupling and make the code harder to test
Consider:
- Implementing a loop-based navigation pattern instead of recursion
- Extracting the menu logic into a separate method
- Using a state machine or command pattern for navigation
Would you like me to provide an example implementation using any of these approaches?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
examples/dotnet/.idea/.idea.ConsoleApp/.idea/.gitignore(1 hunks)examples/dotnet/.idea/.idea.ConsoleApp/.idea/vcs.xml(1 hunks)examples/dotnet/Program.cs(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- examples/dotnet/.idea/.idea.ConsoleApp/.idea/.gitignore
- examples/dotnet/.idea/.idea.ConsoleApp/.idea/vcs.xml
github-actions
bot
added
size/S
|
@gstraccini csharpier |
|
Running CSharpier on this branch! 🔧 |
|
❌ CSharpier failed! |
guibranco
removed
the
🚦 awaiting triage
|
Hi @victorbrandaao 👋, Thank you so much for your pull request! 🙌 I appreciate the time and effort you put into this contribution. Thanks again for your valuable contribution! 🚀 |
Descrição
Adiciona funcionalidades para listar e filtrar bancos brasileiros com base no código COMPE.
Mudanças Principais
ShowBankspara exibir a lista de bancos.GetCompeFromUserpara obter o código COMPE do usuário.FilterBankspara filtrar e exibir bancos com base no código COMPE fornecido.Como Testar
Informações Adicionais
bancos.jsonestá presente no diretóriodatae contém dados válidos.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation