Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade bancos-brasileiros from 6.0.67 to 6.0.69 #554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Owner

@guibranco guibranco commented Sep 30, 2024

User description

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade bancos-brasileiros from 6.0.67 to 6.0.69.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 24 days ago.

Release notes
Package name: bancos-brasileiros
  • 6.0.69 - 2024-09-06
  • 6.0.68 - 2024-09-05
  • 6.0.67 - 2024-09-01
from bancos-brasileiros GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:


Description

  • Upgraded bancos-brasileiros from version 6.0.67 to 6.0.69 in both package.json and package-lock.json.
  • This upgrade addresses potential vulnerabilities and ensures compatibility with the latest features.
  • The new version was released on September 6, 2024.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Dependencies
package-lock.json
Update bancos-brasileiros version in package-lock.json     

examples/emberjs/package-lock.json

  • Updated bancos-brasileiros version from 6.0.67 to 6.0.69.
  • Adjusted integrity hash for the new version.
  • +7/-7     
    package.json
    Update bancos-brasileiros version in package.json               

    examples/emberjs/package.json

  • Changed bancos-brasileiros dependency version from 6.0.67 to 6.0.69.
  • +1/-1     

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    • Chores
      • Updated the version of the bancos-brasileiros dependency to improve stability and performance.

    Snyk has created this PR to upgrade bancos-brasileiros from 6.0.67 to 6.0.69.
    
    See this package in npm:
    bancos-brasileiros
    
    See this project in Snyk:
    https://app.snyk.io/org/guibranco/project/337dc2ee-ac4c-4ec7-8f33-7fddb26040de?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

    Walkthrough

    The pull request updates the package.json file for the emberjs project, specifically changing the version of the bancos-brasileiros dependency from ^6.0.67 to ^6.0.69. This change does not include any other modifications to dependencies, scripts, or configurations.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    examples/emberjs/package.json Updated bancos-brasileiros dependency version from ^6.0.67 to ^6.0.69

    Possibly related PRs

    Suggested labels

    Review effort [1-5]: 1

    Suggested reviewers

    • gstraccini

    🐰 In the meadow where bunnies play,
    A version change has come our way.
    From six-oh-sixty-seven we leap,
    To six-oh-sixty-nine, a hop so deep!
    Dependencies updated, all is bright,
    Let's code away, with pure delight! 🐇✨


    📜 Recent review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL

    📥 Commits

    Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb2bc8a and 05275c0.

    ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
    • examples/emberjs/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
    📒 Files selected for processing (1)
    • examples/emberjs/package.json (1 hunks)
    🔇 Additional comments (1)
    examples/emberjs/package.json (1)

    70-70: Version update for bancos-brasileiros looks good.

    The update from version ^6.0.67 to ^6.0.69 for the bancos-brasileiros package aligns with the PR objectives. This change follows semantic versioning principles, indicating a patch update that should be backwards compatible.

    To ensure this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes, let's verify the release notes:

    Please review the release notes to confirm that no breaking changes or significant updates were introduced in these versions.


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    @gstraccini gstraccini bot added the ☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Sep 30, 2024
    @github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 30, 2024
    @penify-dev penify-dev bot added the enhancement A enhancement to the project label Sep 30, 2024
    @penify-dev penify-dev bot changed the title [Snyk] Upgrade bancos-brasileiros from 6.0.67 to 6.0.69 Upgrade bancos-brasileiros from 6.0.67 to 6.0.69 Sep 30, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Sep 30, 2024

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    1, because this PR only involves a straightforward version upgrade of a dependency with no significant changes in the codebase.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    ⚡ Possible issues

    No

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    Copy link

    New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

    Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
    npm/[email protected] None 0 313 kB guibranco

    🚮 Removed packages: npm/[email protected]

    View full report↗︎

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

    💻 Scan logs
    11:55PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    11:55PM INF 981 commits scanned.
    11:55PM INF scan completed in 2.52s
    11:55PM INF no leaks found
    

    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Sep 30, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Testing
    Execute tests to confirm application stability post-upgrade

    After upgrading, run tests to ensure that the application behaves as expected with the new
    version of bancos-brasileiros.

    examples/emberjs/package-lock.json [12]

    -"bancos-brasileiros": "^6.0.69"
    +"bancos-brasileiros": "^6.0.69" // Run tests after upgrade
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Running tests after an upgrade is crucial for maintaining application stability, making this a strong suggestion, although it does not directly modify the code.

    8
    Security
    Validate the integrity hash for the new version to ensure it is correct

    Consider checking the integrity hash to ensure it matches the expected value for the new
    version.

    examples/emberjs/package-lock.json [4885]

    -"integrity": "sha512-AwuHlzRKzNFPxlK4spuxudMHp4ozF7KOnwRi9nXZCd3ikiaovusHqpFPuEOP5OKrlu+WDoN52bV3Z8k3NO422w=="
    +"integrity": "sha512-AwuHlzRKzNFPxlK4spuxudMHp4ozF7KOnwRi9nXZCd3ikiaovusHqpFPuEOP5OKrlu+WDoN52bV3Z8k3NO422w==" // Verify integrity
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Validating the integrity hash is a good practice for security, but the suggestion does not propose any changes to the code itself, limiting its impact.

    7
    Enhancement
    Review any additional configuration requirements for the new version

    Check if the new version of bancos-brasileiros requires any additional configuration or
    changes in your application.

    examples/emberjs/package.json [70]

    -"bancos-brasileiros": "^6.0.69"
    +"bancos-brasileiros": "^6.0.69" // Check for additional configuration
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: This suggestion encourages reviewing additional requirements, which is useful, but it lacks specificity in terms of actionable changes to the code.

    6
    Compatibility
    Verify compatibility of the new version with existing dependencies

    Ensure that the new version of bancos-brasileiros is compatible with other dependencies in
    your project to avoid potential conflicts.

    examples/emberjs/package-lock.json [12]

    -"bancos-brasileiros": "^6.0.69"
    +"bancos-brasileiros": "^6.0.69" // Ensure compatibility
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: While ensuring compatibility is important, the suggestion does not provide a specific action or change to the code, making it more of a general recommendation rather than a concrete improvement.

    5

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Summary

    Status Count
    🔍 Total 462
    ✅ Successful 360
    ⏳ Timeouts 0
    🔀 Redirected 0
    👻 Excluded 98
    ❓ Unknown 0
    🚫 Errors 4

    Errors per input

    Errors in ./CHANGELOG.md

    Errors in ./data/bancos.md

    Copy link

    @guibranco guibranco merged commit fc6229c into main Oct 1, 2024
    45 checks passed
    @guibranco guibranco deleted the snyk-upgrade-8fd591c567a73d93e922972561f19302 branch October 1, 2024 11:54
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    ☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) enhancement A enhancement to the project Review effort [1-5]: 1 size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants