Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hackathon] implement kontext client authorization #3892

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

d14c
Copy link

@d14c d14c commented Aug 8, 2024

What?

Hackathon content ⚠️ Do not review, do not merge ⚠️

Why?

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have added tests for my changes.
  • I have run linter locally (make lint) and all checks pass.
  • I have run tests locally (make tests) and all tests pass.
  • I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.

Related PR(s)/Issue(s)

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@d14c d14c marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2024 14:22
@d14c d14c requested a review from a team as a code owner August 8, 2024 14:22
@d14c d14c requested review from mstoykov and codebien and removed request for a team August 8, 2024 14:22
@oleiade oleiade changed the title implement kontext client authorization [Hackathon] implement kontext client authorization Aug 8, 2024
@oleiade oleiade removed request for mstoykov and codebien August 8, 2024 14:31
@d14c d14c merged commit 8b4f70d into kontext Aug 8, 2024
16 of 23 checks passed
@d14c d14c deleted the kontext-authz branch August 8, 2024 14:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants