Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/vendor coupon distribution #2493

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kzamanbd
Copy link
Contributor

@kzamanbd kzamanbd commented Dec 24, 2024

All Submissions:

  • My code follow the WordPress' coding standards
  • My code satisfies feature requirements
  • My code is tested
  • My code passes the PHPCS tests
  • My code has proper inline documentation
  • I've included related pull request(s) (optional)
  • I've included developer documentation (optional)
  • I've added proper labels to this pull request

Changes proposed in this Pull Request:

Related Pull Request(s)

  • Full PR Link

Closes

  • Closes #

How to test the changes in this Pull Request:

  • Steps or issue link

Changelog entry

Title

Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.

Before Changes

Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).

After Changes

Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).

Feature Video (optional)

Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.

PR Self Review Checklist:

  • Code is not following code style guidelines
  • Bad naming: make sure you would understand your code if you read it a few months from now.
  • KISS: Keep it simple, Sweetie (not stupid!).
  • DRY: Don't Repeat Yourself.
  • Code that is not readable: too many nested 'if's are a bad sign.
  • Performance issues
  • Complicated constructions that need refactoring or comments: code should almost always be self-explanatory.
  • Grammar errors.

FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:

As a reviewer, your feedback should be focused on the idea, not the person. Seek to understand, be respectful, and focus on constructive dialog.

As a contributor, your responsibility is to learn from suggestions and iterate your pull request should it be needed based on feedback. Seek to collaborate and produce the best possible contribution to the greater whole.

  • Correct — Does the change do what it’s supposed to? ie: code 100% fulfilling the requirements?
  • Secure — Would a nefarious party find some way to exploit this change? ie: everything is sanitized/escaped appropriately for any SQL or XSS injection possibilities?
  • Readable — Will your future self be able to understand this change months down the road?
  • Elegant — Does the change fit aesthetically within the overall style and architecture?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new Coupon class for enhanced coupon management in WooCommerce.
    • Added functionalities for attaching and removing coupon info from order items.
    • Implemented methods for applying and managing coupons across parent and child orders.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified coupon processing for sub-orders by removing unnecessary parameters.
  • Refactor

    • Updated method signatures to streamline coupon handling processes.
    • Enhanced the Hooks class to integrate coupon distribution capabilities.
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive tests for various coupon functionalities to ensure correct application and restrictions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces enhancements to coupon management within the Dokan plugin. A new Coupon class is added in the WeDevs\Dokan\Vendor namespace, providing various methods for handling coupon operations. The create_coupons method in the Manager class has been updated to remove the $seller_products parameter, simplifying the aggregation of discounts based on parent orders. Additionally, the Hooks class constructor is modified to instantiate the new Coupon class, integrating its functionalities.

Changes

File Change Summary
includes/Order/Manager.php Modified create_coupons method to remove $seller_products parameter and simplify coupon processing.
includes/Vendor/Coupon.php New class added with comprehensive coupon management methods, including adding/removing coupon info and processing discounts for child orders.
includes/Vendor/Hooks.php Updated constructor to instantiate the new Coupon class.
tests/php/src/Coupon/CouponTest.php New test class added to validate coupon application logic for multi-vendor orders.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

:+1: Dev Review Done, Need Dev Review Only, Test Automation, Upcoming Release

Suggested reviewers

  • mrabbani

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, coupon magic unfurls,
Discounts dancing, order flags uncurl,
Vendor dreams now take their flight,
Coupons spreading their discount might,
A rabbit's code, both smart and light! 🎉


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b5d06d and 7998839.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/php/src/Coupon/CouponTest.php (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/php/src/Coupon/CouponTest.php

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@kzamanbd kzamanbd added Needs: Testing This requires further testing Needs: Dev Review It requires a developer review and approval labels Dec 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (2)

153-192: Child order coupon sync is correct; watch for partial usage
Applying the coupon to sub-orders is handled well. However, if a coupon has usage limits or partial application complexities, verifying that the parent’s partial usage is reflected correctly in child orders is key.


223-232: Consider re-checking final amounts after child coupon removal
When removing a coupon from sub-orders, you remove the coupon code and save. Ensure the child orders recalculate totals so that subsequent item manipulations (like partial refunds) remain consistent.

includes/Vendor/Hooks.php (1)

20-22: Store the Coupon instance for flexibility
Instead of creating new Coupon() inline, consider assigning it to a property if you plan to reference it later or unhook any of its methods. Otherwise, this is perfectly fine for a straightforward solution.

includes/Order/Manager.php (2)

839-845: Mapping coupon codes
Extracting coupon codes via array_map is succinct. Make sure the new array only contains unique codes if the parent uses repeated codes.


864-877: Create new coupon items – consider discount tax
Creating WC_Order_Item_Coupon objects is solid. Just confirm whether any discount tax or shipping discount portion needs to be tracked.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dbaf57c and a126a95.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • includes/Order/Manager.php (4 hunks)
  • includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (1 hunks)
  • includes/Vendor/Hooks.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (6)

17-23: Constructor hooks look good, but consider null checks for safety
All add_action and add_filter calls appear correct. As a best practice, you might want to confirm that the relevant WooCommerce classes and objects are loaded before hooking your methods, especially if any third-party integrations could be disabled.


35-56: Gracefully handle potential null order
The method retrieves an order via wc_get_order($data->get_order_id()) but does not verify if it succeeds. Consider checking for a null or invalid order object before proceeding to avoid calling methods on a potentially null variable.


68-79: Concurrency note on adding/removing filters
Removing and re-adding the woocommerce_coupon_get_apply_quantity filter works in a single-threaded context but could cause race conditions if multiple coupon calculations occurred in parallel. WooCommerce typically runs in single-threaded PHP processes, so this may be acceptable.


91-100: Ensure proper context for $discounts->get_object()
You correctly branch for WC_Cart vs WC_Order. Just ensure that if a new context (like a subscription renewal or an invoice scenario) triggers this hook, your code can handle or ignore it gracefully.


203-216: Avoid reapplication of coupons
You skip applying the coupon if it already exists in $used_coupons. This is correct. Just confirm you handle usage-limit coupons properly in the parent or child to avoid over-applying discounts.


272-286: Cart item removal logic looks good
Removing coupon info from each cart item is properly structured, updating $cart_contents with the revised metadata. Looks good for typical store workflows.

includes/Order/Manager.php (5)

11-11: Import statement is appropriately placed
use WeDevs\Dokan\Vendor\Coupon; is consistent with existing imports. This is fine.


632-632: Calling create_coupons is a good approach
This centralizes coupon logic in one method, ensuring the logic is maintainable. Verify that your error handling in create_coupons gracefully recovers if any coupon application fails.


827-829: Skip if no coupons
Early return on empty $parent_coupons is optimal for performance. This is a clean pattern to avoid overhead.


847-848: Initialize arrays
Defining $order_items and $used_coupons_data is straightforward. This chunk is trivial but correct.


849-862: Summing coupon discounts
Accumulating coupon amounts into $used_coupons_data is correct. If usage-limited coupons are partially redeemed, confirm you’re not exceeding the coupon’s usage limit.

includes/Vendor/Coupon.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
includes/Vendor/Coupon.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kzamanbd kzamanbd self-assigned this Dec 24, 2024
@kzamanbd kzamanbd requested a review from mrabbani December 26, 2024 04:59
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (3)

68-79: Performance consideration: cloned discount object
Cloning the WC_Discounts instance for applying coupons ($discounts_clone->apply_coupon( $coupon )) can be CPU- and memory-intensive in larger stores. Although it ensures the original discount state remains unaltered, make sure you truly need a clone. If performance is a concern, see if there's a more efficient strategy (e.g., partial or lazy cloning).


224-232: Check for empty child orders
When removing coupons from child orders, ensure $sub_orders is not empty or null before iterating. This is typically safe but adding a quick check can prevent edge-case warnings if no child orders exist.

+ if ( empty( $sub_orders ) ) {
+     return;
+ }

234-266: Ensure consistent discount distribution for multiple coupons
The loop adjusts each coupon’s discount once the total exceeds the product price ($limit_reached). If multiple coupons are applied, ensure that subsequent coupons are zeroed out in a user-friendly manner. This logic is correct, but consider clarifying it in comments or documentation to avoid future confusion.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a126a95 and 95f27e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (6)

17-23: Validate existence of valid order/cart objects in hooks
Inside the constructor, multiple hooks (e.g., woocommerce_checkout_create_order_line_item) assume valid cart or order objects. It might be safer to add extra checks where these hooks are called, especially in methods like add_coupon_info_to_order_item, to avoid potential null references if an order or cart fails to load.


91-100: Validate order existence before meta updates
Similar to the removal logic, ensure $order is a legit WC_Order object before passing it to save_coupon_data_to_order_item(). This avoids potential null reference issues when the order lookup fails.


127-136: Existing safe handling of division by zero
Good job using a ternary operator to avoid a division-by-zero error when $item_object['quantity'] is zero. This ensures safe fallback to 0.


256-260: Well-handled negative discount scenario
This logic ensures that discount does not exceed the total product price by capping coupon discounts at zero. This addresses the negative discount edge-case thoroughly.


277-287: Maintain consistency between cart and order data
When removing coupon info from cart items, confirm that the resulting cart accurately reflects the removal in all subsequent order summaries. The code looks synchronized, but consider verifying or testing large cart scenarios to ensure correctness.


181-181: ⚠️ Potential issue

Guard against division by zero for order item quantities
Here, for $order_item->get_quantity(), no check is performed before dividing $discount_amount. If $order_item->get_quantity() returns 0 (or unexpectedly negative), this raises a potential division-by-zero error.

- 'per_qty_amount'    => $discount_amount / $order_item->get_quantity(),
+ 'per_qty_amount'    => $order_item->get_quantity() > 0
+   ? ( $discount_amount / $order_item->get_quantity() )
+   : 0,

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

includes/Vendor/Coupon.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (1)

275-289: Minor concurrency nitpick
If multiple coupons are removed in parallel (e.g., from different browser sessions), there may be a slight chance of race conditions overwriting each other’s changes. Consider verifying final cart state if concurrency is a serious concern in your environment.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 95f27e6 and ed5672a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (5)

15-16: Constant naming is consistent and clear
This naming is easy to reference and concisely communicates that the meta key is specific to Dokan coupons.


35-40: Great job guarding against invalid or missing $order
This prevents potential fatal errors when the order doesn’t exist or has an invalid ID.


70-81: Verify concurrency with hooking/unhooking filters
Removing and re-adding filters in the same request is standard for preventing recursion. However, if concurrency or nested calls occur in high-traffic scenarios, confirm that no filters remain unintentionally unregistered or re-registered out of sequence.


245-264: Exceeding discount logic is properly handled
The use of $limit_reached and max() is an effective safeguard against negative discount amounts and ensures the discount does not surpass the product price.


183-183: ⚠️ Potential issue

Prevent potential division by zero
If $order_item->get_quantity() is zero, the expression can cause a division by zero error.

Proposed fix:

- 'per_qty_amount'    => $discount_amount / $order_item->get_quantity(),
+ 'per_qty_amount'    => $order_item->get_quantity() > 0 
+     ? ( $discount_amount / $order_item->get_quantity() ) 
+     : 0,

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

includes/Vendor/Coupon.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (5)

17-23: Constructor Hooks & Priorities
Registering actions and filters in the constructor is an effective approach. If further customization or interoperability is needed (e.g., with other plugins hooking into the same events), consider exposing configurable hook priorities or toggles.


95-114: Consider Splitting Logic for Maintainability
Within save_item_coupon_discount, the flow differs significantly based on whether the discount applies to a cart or an order. If these paths continue to grow, consider extracting them into separate classes to simplify maintenance.


156-206: Reducing Code Duplication
The logic for filtering coupon codes, calculating discounts, and setting _dokan_coupon_info is largely repeated across cart and order items. If feasible, consider extracting a shared helper function or class method to maintain DRY principles.


208-246: Sub-Order Synchronization
Applying and removing coupons from child orders ensures consistent discount handling. If any advanced scenarios arise (e.g., partial refunds, order cancellations), ensure they also propagate appropriately to child orders. Currently, the approach appears solid.

Would you like help adding fallback logic for scenarios like partial refund or order cancellation to keep sub-orders fully in sync?


248-302: Discount Capping Logic
The code caps total discount at the product price by computing $remain_discount and adjusting subsequent coupons to zero. This logic is correct if the intended behavior is to ignore extra coupon amounts. For a more equitable cost-sharing across coupons, consider distributing the remainder among all relevant coupons.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ed5672a and 2923cbe.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
includes/Vendor/Coupon.php (4)

1-3: Namespace and PSR-4 Compliance Looks Good
The namespace WeDevs\Dokan\Vendor and file structure appear to follow recommended PSR-4 conventions and WordPress best practices. No immediate concerns here.


25-58: Robust Null Checks are in Place
The method ensures $data is an instance of WC_Order_Item_Coupon and performs a null check on $order before proceeding. This addresses prior concerns about possible null returns from wc_get_order. Implementation is solid.


60-93: Coupon Interception Approach
Cloning $discounts to preserve state before reapplying the coupon is a clever strategy. However, be mindful that subsequent logic on $discounts_clone should not affect the main $discounts object once reattached. Make sure any shared references are handled carefully if the logic becomes more complex in the future.


116-154: Division-by-Zero Guard
The check ($item_object['quantity'] > 0 ? ... : 0) correctly prevents division by zero. This aligns with prior recommendations.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
tests/php/src/Coupon/CouponTest.php (4)

16-42: Method naming convention.
PHPUnit typically expects setUp() instead of set_up(). Using the standard public function setUp(): void can improve IDE and toolchain compatibility.

-public function set_up() {
+public function setUp(): void {

44-61: Comprehensive order data setup.
The get_order_data() method provides a clear sample order. Consider adding more variations (e.g., multiple line items, different prices) for extended coverage.


92-106: Testing coupon with all products.
The discount assertion is valid, and suborder counting is verified. You may want to test shipping cost calculations if relevant for the final billing.


148-177: Testing coupon usage limit.
This test correctly checks that a coupon with a usage_limit of 1 applies only once. Consider verifying behavior across multiple customers or sessions.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 08fb859 and 5b234d5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/php/src/Coupon/CouponTest.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
tests/php/src/Coupon/CouponTest.php (9)

3-4: Namespace usage aligns with plugin structure.
No issues found.


5-7: Imports and base test class.
The Exception and DokanTestCase classes are correctly imported and used.


8-11: Descriptive test group annotation.
The @group coupon-discount annotation is a good way to group and run related tests selectively.


14-15: Use of typed properties.
Declaring typed properties (e.g., public int $product_id1;) helps ensure type safety and clarity.


67-85: Data provider for all products.
The data provider covers a basic percent discount scenario. Consider adding edge cases such as zero or negative discount values for thorough testing.


112-127: Data provider for specific products.
The array for fixed product discount is sufficient for basic coverage. Consider adding a scenario with multiple product IDs for more realistic coverage.


135-147: Testing specific product coupons.
The test properly verifies the discount for included product IDs. You might add an additional test for multiple coupons applied simultaneously if needed.


178-199: Test with minimum amount requirement.
This ensures the coupon isn't applied if the order doesn't meet the minimum. Consider adding an edge case where the order total is exactly the minimum amount (like 200) to verify boundary conditions.


200-220: Email restriction enforcement.
The test confirms that the coupon is not applied for unmatched emails. Good approach. Optionally, add a test for multiple allowed email addresses to confirm partial matches.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
tests/php/src/Coupon/CouponTest.php (5)

21-46: Consider extracting test data setup into helper methods.

The test data setup logic could be more maintainable by extracting the creation of sellers, products, categories, and customers into separate helper methods.

Example refactor:

public function data_provider(): array {
-    $this->seller_id1 = $this->factory()->seller->create();
-    $this->seller_id2 = $this->factory()->seller->create();
-    $this->category_id1 = $this->factory()->term->create( [ 'taxonomy' => 'product_cat' ] );
+    $this->setupSellers();
+    $this->setupCategories();
+    $this->setupProducts();
+    $this->setupCustomers();

47-61: Fix indentation inconsistency.

The code uses a mix of tabs and spaces for indentation. Consider using spaces consistently throughout the file.


66-238: Consider using constants for test values.

The test data contains magic numbers for prices, discounts, and other values. Consider defining these as class constants to improve maintainability and make the test's intent clearer.

Example:

+ private const PRODUCT_1_PRICE = 50;
+ private const PRODUCT_2_PRICE = 30;
+ private const PERCENTAGE_DISCOUNT = 20;
+ private const FIXED_DISCOUNT = 5;
+ private const MINIMUM_AMOUNT = 150;

  return [
      'discount_type_percentage' => [
          [
              'coupons' => [
                  [
                      'meta' => [
                          'discount_type' => 'percent',
-                         'coupon_amount' => 20,
+                         'coupon_amount' => self::PERCENTAGE_DISCOUNT,

246-285: Enhance test assertions and error messages.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Add descriptive messages to assertions to make test failures more informative
  2. Add assertions for free shipping status where applicable (e.g., 'single vendor order' case)

Example enhancement:

- $this->assertEquals( $expected['discount'], $order->get_discount_total() );
+ $this->assertEquals(
+     $expected['discount'],
+     $order->get_discount_total(),
+     sprintf(
+         'Expected discount of %s but got %s for coupon scenario',
+         $expected['discount'],
+         $order->get_discount_total()
+     )
+ );

+ if ( isset( $expected['free_shipping'] ) ) {
+     $this->assertTrue(
+         $order->get_shipping_total() === '0',
+         'Free shipping was not applied correctly'
+     );
+ }

66-238: Consider adding test cases for additional scenarios.

The test coverage could be enhanced by adding test cases for:

  1. Multiple coupons applied to the same order
  2. Invalid coupon scenarios (expired, usage limit reached)
  3. Individual use coupons
  4. Usage limits (per user, per coupon)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b234d5 and 7b5d06d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/php/src/Coupon/CouponTest.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/php/src/Coupon/CouponTest.php (1)

1-15: Well-structured test class setup!

The class follows PHPUnit best practices with proper namespace, test group annotation, and typed properties.

@kzamanbd kzamanbd added Needs: Dev Review It requires a developer review and approval and removed Needs: Author Reply labels Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs: Dev Review It requires a developer review and approval Needs: Testing This requires further testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants