-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 924
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Galaxy SSA Poll Results Slides #4972
Conversation
…ents (as per their request) to the slide' contributors as this type.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've made a number of suggestions @vladvisan
I think the main thing is the change in audience and change in voice necessary as you add these slides to the GTN.
When you presented to the admins it was great to hear your interpretations in every slide. And the audience was solely small scale admins very familiar with Galaxy.
As we move this to the GTN, and it is "speaking" as a galaxy training material, I think it might need to change a bit to be useful as a more general resource for groups deciding whether or not they want to host Galaxy. These graphs are incredibly useful in answering a question we get very frequently: "how much time does it take", when that question is more of a business decision of whether or not they want to host galaxy.
So I've made a number of suggestions, so the slides speak from a position of being a galaxy training material, communicating to both admins and group leads trying to make decisions about can they run Galaxy.
You are of course welcome to reject the suggestions if you do not agree with them.
overall I'm very excited to have the results of this poll in an easy-to-consume format that we can use for admins and training events to communicate how much burden it takes on average, especially since the admin training is generally given by admins that manage large instances.
@hexylena Thank you for the detailed feedback! I looked at it all, and I agree with all of it. |
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Helena <[email protected]>
… the required captions. But having added alt-texts to the images, thanks to Helena, hopefully it will still be accessible
…or the suggestions
Also good job at the GCC conference, I watched your & Saskia's presentation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great, I'm happy with the contents, ordering, and other aspects, let's ship it :)
thank you! it has definitely grown over the years 😅 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, all tests pass! Nice work @vladvisan. If you're happy, let me know, and we can merge this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Definitely looks better than initially, thank you for the feedback that allowed this. |
Yes, all good for me as well, I think we can merge it :D |
I've finished the content, unless someone has any extra feedback (first round of feedback was already given on May 15, and I applied it before submitting this PR).
I will send this PR's link to the mailing list, and let's say if by Tuesday June 4 EoD there is no feedback, then it can get accepted?
New data contributor type: I added a new contributor type (Data provider), here is the "proof" it works:
A few details: