Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change divan output label #124

Closed
wants to merge 25 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Marie59
Copy link
Collaborator

@Marie59 Marie59 commented Aug 6, 2024

I discovered a tiny glitch when trying to build my workflow this should fix it

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
<param name="selmax" type="integer" min="0" max="100" optional="true" value="0" label="Maximum of the salinity"/>
</inputs>
<outputs>
<data name="output_netcdf" label="DIVAnd netcdf output" from_work_dir="outputs_netcdf/*.nc" format="netcdf"/>
<data name="output_netcdf" label="DIVAnd_output.nc" from_work_dir="outputs_netcdf/*.nc" format="netcdf"/>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You rely on the Name in your workflow?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I rely on the extension .nc
The ODV tool does not know ho to read a netcdf if does not have a .nc extension

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But the ODV tool could just ln -s $input ./foo.nc and it would solve it no?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the Cheetah code put that ? mmmh not sure what if it's not a netcdf that we input but a tabular this would mess up ODV right ?

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
<description>Data-Interpolating Variational Analysis in n dimensions</description>
<macros>
<token name="@TOOL_VERSION@">0.1.0</token>
<token name="@VERSION_SUFFIX@">0</token>
<token name="@VERSION_SUFFIX@">0.0.1</token>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

its a simple integer, 0 ... 1... 2...3

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh I thought it follows the rule when you have minor fixes 0.0.+1, update 0.+1 or major changes +1

@Marie59 Marie59 closed this Aug 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants