-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: handle posted at #228
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Boolean field named Changes
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@anishfyle has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/fyle/models.py (1)
102-102
: Enhance help text clarityThe help text could be more precise about the field's purpose and its relationship with the posted_at field.
Consider updating the help text:
- is_posted_at_null = models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Flag check if posted at is null or not') + is_posted_at_null = models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Indicates if posted_at is null and spent_at should be used instead')
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/fyle/models.py
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/fyle/models.py (1)
102-102
: Verify complete implementation across codebase
Please ensure that related components are updated to handle this new field:
- Serializers should include this field if the posted_at field is exposed
- Tests should be updated to cover the new field behavior
- Any views or services using posted_at should consider this flag
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual content of these files to better understand the usage of posted_at
and determine if updates are needed.
Let me check one more thing to see if there are any views or API endpoints that might be handling the posted_at field.
No additional updates required for the new field
Based on the verification results:
- The
posted_at
field is already properly handled in the model with both the datetime field and the new boolean flag - Test fixtures in
test_fyle/fixtures.py
already include cases with both null and non-nullposted_at
values - The field is correctly used in data transformations as seen in the model's implementation
- No serializers are currently exposing the
posted_at
field, which is consistent with its internal usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for related files that might need updates
echo "Checking for serializers..."
rg -l "posted_at" apps/fyle/serializers.py || true
echo "Checking for tests..."
rg -l "posted_at" tests/ || true
echo "Checking for views/services using posted_at..."
rg -l "posted_at" apps/fyle/views.py apps/fyle/services.py || true
Length of output: 534
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of files that use posted_at
echo "Checking test_base_model.py..."
rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 tests/test_sage300/test_exports/test_base_model.py
echo -e "\nChecking test_mappings fixtures..."
rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 tests/test_mappings/fixtures.py
echo -e "\nChecking fyle fixtures..."
rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 tests/test_fyle/fixtures.py
echo -e "\nChecking if posted_at is used in serializers..."
rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 apps/fyle/serializers.py || true
Length of output: 3615
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for views and API endpoints handling posted_at
echo "Checking views in apps/fyle directory..."
fd -e py . apps/fyle -x rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 {} || true
echo -e "\nChecking API related files..."
fd -e py . apps/api -x rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 {} || true
Length of output: 1864
Description
Clickup
Summary by CodeRabbit
is_posted_at_null
, to track if theposted_at
timestamp is null in the Expense model.