Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: handle posted at #228

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

feat: handle posted at #228

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

anishfyle
Copy link
Contributor

@anishfyle anishfyle commented Nov 13, 2024

Description

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new flag, is_posted_at_null, to track if the posted_at timestamp is null in the Expense model.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new Boolean field named is_posted_at_null to the Expense class in the apps/fyle/models.py file. This field is set to default to False and serves as a flag to indicate whether the posted_at field is null. The modification enhances the data structure of the Expense model without altering any existing fields, methods, or classes.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/fyle/models.py Added a new Boolean field is_posted_at_null to the Expense class with default value False and help text.

Poem

In the fields where expenses grow,
A new flag appears, as we all know.
is_posted_at_null, a watchful eye,
To track the time as it flutters by.
With a hop and a skip, we celebrate,
New changes here, oh, isn't it great? 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@anishfyle has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a380b9f and 0ab7336.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
157 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 11.882s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/fyle/models.py (1)

102-102: Enhance help text clarity

The help text could be more precise about the field's purpose and its relationship with the posted_at field.

Consider updating the help text:

-    is_posted_at_null = models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Flag check if posted at is null or not')
+    is_posted_at_null = models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Indicates if posted_at is null and spent_at should be used instead')
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a380b9f and 0ab7336.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/fyle/models.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/fyle/models.py (1)

102-102: Verify complete implementation across codebase

Please ensure that related components are updated to handle this new field:

  1. Serializers should include this field if the posted_at field is exposed
  2. Tests should be updated to cover the new field behavior
  3. Any views or services using posted_at should consider this flag
✅ Verification successful

Let me check the actual content of these files to better understand the usage of posted_at and determine if updates are needed.


Let me check one more thing to see if there are any views or API endpoints that might be handling the posted_at field.


No additional updates required for the new field

Based on the verification results:

  1. The posted_at field is already properly handled in the model with both the datetime field and the new boolean flag
  2. Test fixtures in test_fyle/fixtures.py already include cases with both null and non-null posted_at values
  3. The field is correctly used in data transformations as seen in the model's implementation
  4. No serializers are currently exposing the posted_at field, which is consistent with its internal usage
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for related files that might need updates

echo "Checking for serializers..."
rg -l "posted_at" apps/fyle/serializers.py || true

echo "Checking for tests..."
rg -l "posted_at" tests/ || true

echo "Checking for views/services using posted_at..."
rg -l "posted_at" apps/fyle/views.py apps/fyle/services.py || true

Length of output: 534


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of files that use posted_at

echo "Checking test_base_model.py..."
rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 tests/test_sage300/test_exports/test_base_model.py

echo -e "\nChecking test_mappings fixtures..."
rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 tests/test_mappings/fixtures.py

echo -e "\nChecking fyle fixtures..."
rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 tests/test_fyle/fixtures.py

echo -e "\nChecking if posted_at is used in serializers..."
rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 apps/fyle/serializers.py || true

Length of output: 3615


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for views and API endpoints handling posted_at

echo "Checking views in apps/fyle directory..."
fd -e py . apps/fyle -x rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 {} || true

echo -e "\nChecking API related files..."
fd -e py . apps/api -x rg "posted_at" -B 2 -A 2 {} || true

Length of output: 1864

apps/fyle/models.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@anishfyle anishfyle requested a review from ruuushhh November 13, 2024 16:43
@anishfyle anishfyle merged commit b7efd2a into master Nov 19, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants