fix: delete expense_attributes_deletion_cache in workspace reset
#704
Conversation
JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
sql/functions/reset-workspace.sql (1)
243-247: LGTM! The new deletion operation is well-structured.The addition follows the established pattern in the function and correctly cleans up the cache table for the workspace.
Consider implementing a more general cache cleanup mechanism that:
- Automatically identifies and cleans all cache tables
- Handles cache invalidation as a separate concern from workspace reset
This would make the system more maintainable as new cache tables are added.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
sql/functions/reset-workspace.sql(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
sql/functions/reset-workspace.sql (1)
Line range hint 1-300: Verify the deletion order maintains referential integrity.
The function handles deletions from multiple related tables. While the new deletion operation for expense_attributes_deletion_cache appears to be placed correctly, it's important to verify that this table doesn't have any foreign key relationships that would require a different deletion order.
✅ Verification successful
The deletion order in reset_workspace function is correct and maintains referential integrity
The expense_attributes_deletion_cache table has a simple structure with a foreign key to workspaces(id) through its workspace_id column, similar to other tables in the schema. The current placement of its deletion (near the end of the function, after dependent tables are cleared) is appropriate and won't violate any referential constraints since:
- No other tables reference this cache table
- Its only foreign key dependency is on the workspaces table, which isn't being deleted in this function
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for foreign key relationships involving the expense_attributes_deletion_cache table
# Search for table definition and foreign key constraints
rg -A 10 "CREATE TABLE.*expense_attributes_deletion_cache"
# Search for potential foreign key references to this table
rg "FOREIGN KEY.*expense_attributes_deletion_cache"
Length of output: 963
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any foreign key constraints referencing workspace_id in expense_attributes_deletion_cache
rg -A 5 "ALTER TABLE.*expense_attributes_deletion_cache.*ADD.*FOREIGN KEY"
# Also check for any references to this table in other constraints
rg -A 5 "REFERENCES.*expense_attributes_deletion_cache"
# Let's also check for workspace_id foreign key pattern in general to understand the common constraint pattern
rg -A 2 "FOREIGN KEY.*workspace_id.*REFERENCES.*workspaces"
Length of output: 7560
|
Clickup
app.clickup.com
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
expense_attributes_deletion_cachetable.Bug Fixes