Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add GitHub PR Checks Workflow #660

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

abhishek1234321
Copy link
Contributor

@abhishek1234321 abhishek1234321 commented Aug 13, 2024

https://app.clickup.com

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a configuration file to enforce standardized pull request titles and descriptions.
    • Added checks to ensure PR titles start with specific prefixes and descriptions include a ClickUp link.
    • Implemented a new GitHub Actions workflow to automate these checks on pull request events.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new configuration file and a GitHub Actions workflow to enforce rules on pull request submissions. The configuration file specifies checks for PR titles and descriptions, ensuring titles start with designated prefixes and descriptions include a link to ClickUp. The workflow automates the validation process during pull request events, utilizing the configuration file for guidance.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/pr-checks-config.yml Added configuration for PR title and description checks, enforcing specific title prefixes and ClickUp links.
.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml Introduced a new workflow for strong PR checks, triggered on PR events, utilizing the configuration file.

Poem

In the meadow where bunnies play,
New rules for PRs brighten the day.
With titles that start just right,
And ClickUp links shining bright,
Our code hops forward, come what may! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
245 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 46.005s ⏱️

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
245 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 51.949s ⏱️

@ashwin1111
Copy link
Contributor

will wait for clickup removal - removing request for now

1 similar comment
@ashwin1111
Copy link
Contributor

will wait for clickup removal - removing request for now

@ashwin1111 ashwin1111 removed their request for review August 19, 2024 06:29
Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
259 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 0s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bbd9ef0 and 1431118.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/pr-checks-config.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/pr-checks-config.yml (1)

3-5: LGTM!

The prefix_check for PR title is implemented correctly. It enforces the required prefixes and provides a clear message when the format is not met. This aligns with the PR objective of introducing a new workflow for PR checks.

.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (1)

1-20: The workflow structure and components look good!

The workflow is well-structured and includes the necessary components for running strong checks on pull requests:

  • Appropriate name and trigger events
  • Correct permissions for pull requests and contents
  • Latest Ubuntu environment for compatibility and stability
  • Usage of a third-party action (fylein/fyle-pr-action@v1) for running strong checks
  • Configuration file (.github/pr-checks-config.yml) for specifying the checks
  • Secure authentication using the GitHub token from secrets

Comment on lines 8 to 10
- name: 'clickup_check'
regex: '(?i)app.clickup.com'
message_if_not_matching: 'PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive)'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider removing the clickup_check based on the reviewer's comments.

The comments from the reviewer ashwin1111 indicate concerns about the ClickUp integration and a request for its removal. Enforcing a ClickUp link in the PR description might not align with the project's current requirements or workflow.

Please discuss with the team and consider removing the clickup_check to address the reviewer's concerns and streamline the PR process.

To remove the clickup_check, apply this diff:

-  description:
-    - name: 'clickup_check'
-      regex: '(?i)app.clickup.com'
-      message_if_not_matching: 'PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive)'
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: 'clickup_check'
regex: '(?i)app.clickup.com'
message_if_not_matching: 'PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive)'

Comment on lines 17 to 20
uses: fylein/fyle-pr-action@v1
with:
github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
config-file: .github/pr-checks-config.yml
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Remove ClickUp-related checks from the PR configuration file

The configuration file .github/pr-checks-config.yml still contains ClickUp-related checks, which contradicts the goal of removing ClickUp references and dependencies. Specifically:

  • There's a check named 'clickup_check'
  • It uses a regex to match 'app.clickup.com'
  • It requires a ClickUp link in the PR description

To address this:

  1. Remove or update the 'clickup_check' section in .github/pr-checks-config.yml.
  2. Review the entire configuration file to ensure no other ClickUp dependencies exist.
  3. Consider replacing the ClickUp link requirement with an alternative tracking method if necessary.

Note: The fylein/fyle-pr-action@v1 action itself doesn't appear to have any ClickUp references, so no changes are needed there.

Analysis chain

Verify if the configuration file or action has any ClickUp-related integrations.

Considering the comments from ashwin1111 regarding the removal of ClickUp references or dependencies, it's important to verify if the configuration file (.github/pr-checks-config.yml) or the fylein/fyle-pr-action@v1 action itself has any ClickUp-related integrations.

To verify this, please run the following script:

This script does the following:

  1. Checks if the .github/pr-checks-config.yml configuration file exists.
  2. If the file exists, it searches for ClickUp references within the file.
  3. Clones the fylein/fyle-pr-action repository to a temporary directory.
  4. Searches for ClickUp references within the cloned repository.
  5. Cleans up the temporary directory.

Please run this script and provide the output to confirm if there are any ClickUp-related integrations in the configuration file or the action itself.


To gather more specific information about the ClickUp references, let's run additional scripts to examine the content of the configuration file and the context of ClickUp references in the action repository.

This script will:

  1. Display the lines containing ClickUp references in the configuration file, including line numbers.
  2. Clone the action repository and search for ClickUp references in JavaScript, YAML, JSON, and Markdown files, showing 2 lines of context before and after each match.

The results will help us understand the nature and extent of the ClickUp references, allowing us to make a more informed decision about their impact and whether they need to be removed or replaced.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash

# Check if the configuration file exists
if [ -f ".github/pr-checks-config.yml" ]; then
  echo "Configuration file found. Checking for ClickUp references..."
  
  # Search for ClickUp references in the configuration file
  if grep -qi "clickup" ".github/pr-checks-config.yml"; then
    echo "ClickUp references found in the configuration file."
  else
    echo "No ClickUp references found in the configuration file."
  fi
else
  echo "Configuration file not found. Unable to verify ClickUp references."
fi

# Check the action repository for ClickUp references
action_repo="https://github.com/fylein/fyle-pr-action"
echo "Checking the action repository for ClickUp references..."

# Clone the action repository
git clone "$action_repo" temp_action_repo

# Search for ClickUp references in the action repository
if grep -qri "clickup" "temp_action_repo"; then
  echo "ClickUp references found in the action repository."
else
  echo "No ClickUp references found in the action repository."
fi

# Clean up the cloned repository
rm -rf temp_action_repo

Length of output: 852


Script:

#!/bin/bash

echo "Examining ClickUp references in the configuration file:"
grep -ni "clickup" .github/pr-checks-config.yml

echo -e "\nSearching for ClickUp references in the action repository:"
git clone https://github.com/fylein/fyle-pr-action temp_action_repo
grep -nri "clickup" temp_action_repo --include="*.{js,yml,json,md}" -C 2

rm -rf temp_action_repo

Length of output: 737

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
259 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 57.572s ⏱️

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
259 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 59.470s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1431118 and fb2427f.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/pr_checks_config.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pr_checks.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/pr_checks_config.yml (1)

1-5: LGTM!

The prefix_check correctly enforces the naming convention for PR titles using a case-insensitive regex. The allowed prefixes align with common practices for categorizing changes.

.github/workflows/pr_checks.yml (2)

1-19: LGTM! The workflow structure and purpose are well-defined.

The "Strong PR Checks" workflow is properly configured to run automated checks on pull requests. The trigger events, permissions, and job setup are all appropriate for the intended purpose.


16-16: Verify the trustworthiness and reliability of the third-party action.

The workflow relies on a third-party action (fylein/fyle-pr-action@v1) to perform the strong checks on pull requests. While using external actions can be beneficial, it's important to ensure the trustworthiness and reliability of the action.

Consider the following:

  • Review the action's documentation and source code to understand its functionality and any potential risks.
  • Check the action's popularity, maintainer reputation, and update frequency to gauge its reliability.
  • Monitor the action for any reported security vulnerabilities or issues.

Comment on lines +7 to +10
description:
- name: 'clickup_check'
regex: '(?i)app.clickup.com'
message_if_not_matching: 'PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive)'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider removing the clickup_check based on the concerns raised.

The PR comments summary indicates that the reviewers are awaiting the removal of ClickUp references before proceeding with the review. The clickup_check enforces the presence of a ClickUp link in the PR description, which might not align with the current consensus.

Consider removing or commenting out the clickup_check until the ClickUp integration is finalized and agreed upon by the team.

To remove the clickup_check, apply this diff:

-  description:
-    - name: 'clickup_check'
-      regex: '(?i)app.clickup.com'
-      message_if_not_matching: 'PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive)'
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
description:
- name: 'clickup_check'
regex: '(?i)app.clickup.com'
message_if_not_matching: 'PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive)'

@abhishek1234321 abhishek1234321 merged commit 00a2d4f into master Sep 19, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants