Changing process bill payments #640
Conversation
Ashutosh619-sudo
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Ashutosh619-sudo has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes improve the Changes
Sequence DiagramssequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TaskScheduler
participant QuickBooksOnline as QBO
participant Fyle
User->>TaskScheduler: Trigger expense reimbursement check
TaskScheduler->>QBO: Call check_expenses_reimbursement_status
QBO->>Fyle: Fetch expense data
Fyle-->>QBO: Return expense data
QBO->>Fyle: Call get_filter_credit_expenses
Fyle-->>QBO: Return filtered credit expenses
QBO-->>TaskScheduler: Update expenses with paid status
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationEnsure proper transaction handling in
process_bill_payments.The
process_bill_paymentsmethod relies on the@handle_qbo_exceptionsdecorator for exception handling. However, the method lacks internaltry,except, orfinallyblocks, raising concerns about the robustness of transaction management. The decorator handles specific exceptions but may not cover all edge cases, especially those related to database integrity.
- File:
apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py- Lines: 571-598
Consider adding explicit
try,except, andfinallyblocks within theprocess_bill_paymentsmethod to ensure comprehensive error handling and maintain database integrity.Analysis chain
Line range hint
595-631: Ensure proper transaction handling inprocess_bill_payments.This method handles bill payment processing. Verify that the transaction management is robust and that all edge cases are handled, especially regarding database integrity and error management.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify transaction handling in `process_bill_payments`. # Test: Search for error handling patterns in the method. rg --type python $'try|except|finally' -C 5 -g 'apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py'Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify transaction handling in `process_bill_payments`. # Test: Search for error handling patterns in the method. rg 'try|except|finally' -C 5 -g 'apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py'Length of output: 24963
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the `@handle_qbo_exceptions` decorator. # Test: Search for the `handle_qbo_exceptions` decorator implementation. rg 'def handle_qbo_exceptions' -A 20Length of output: 1694
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py
14-14:
apps.fyle.models.Reimbursementimported but unusedRemove unused import:
apps.fyle.models.Reimbursement(F401)
173-173: Within an
exceptclause, raise exceptions withraise ... from errorraise ... from Noneto distinguish them from errors in exception handling(B904)
239-241: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
240-241: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
244-247: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
253-253: Avoid extraneous parentheses
Remove extraneous parentheses
(UP034)
274-275: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
278-279: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
316-316: Comparison to
Noneshould becond is NoneReplace with
cond is None(E711)
316-316: Use implicit references for positional format fields
Remove explicit positional indices
(UP030)
316-316: Use f-string instead of
formatcallConvert to f-string
(UP032)
639-639: Use f-string instead of
formatcallConvert to f-string
(UP032)
Additional comments not posted (2)
apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py (2)
631-637: Use f-string for dynamic string formatting.The
formatmethod is used for string formatting. It's recommended to use f-strings for better readability and performance.- task_log, _ = TaskLog.objects.update_or_create(workspace_id=workspace_id, task_id='PAYMENT_{}'.format(bill.expense_group.id), defaults={'status': 'IN_PROGRESS', 'type': 'CREATING_BILL_PAYMENT'}) + task_log, _ = TaskLog.objects.update_or_create(workspace_id=workspace_id, task_id=f'PAYMENT_{bill.expense_group.id}', defaults={'status': 'IN_PROGRESS', 'type': 'CREATING_BILL_PAYMENT'})Likely invalid or redundant comment.
574-595: Updated function signature and logic incheck_expenses_reimbursement_status.The function now takes additional parameters
workspace_idandplatform, and includes logic to manage thepaid_on_fyleflag based on the payment status from Fyle. Ensure that all calls to this function are updated to pass the new parameters.Verification successful
Function calls to
check_expenses_reimbursement_statusare updated correctly.The
check_expenses_reimbursement_statusfunction is called with the new parametersworkspace_idandplatformin the codebase.
apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py: check_expenses_reimbursement_status(bill.expense_group.expenses.all(), workspace_id=workspace_id, platform=platform)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `check_expenses_reimbursement_status` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type python $'check_expenses_reimbursement_status'Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `check_expenses_reimbursement_status` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type py $'check_expenses_reimbursement_status'Length of output: 355
apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py
Outdated
| from fyle_accounting_mappings.models import DestinationAttribute, EmployeeMapping, ExpenseAttribute, Mapping | ||
| from fyle_integrations_platform_connector import PlatformConnector | ||
| from qbosdk.exceptions import InvalidTokenError, WrongParamsError | ||
|
|
||
| from apps.fyle.actions import update_expenses_in_progress | ||
| from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, Reimbursement | ||
| from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, ExpenseGroupSettings, Reimbursement |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused import: Reimbursement.
The static analysis tool flagged that Reimbursement is imported but unused. Removing it will clean up the code.
- from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, ExpenseGroupSettings, Reimbursement
+ from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, ExpenseGroupSettingsCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, ExpenseGroupSettings, Reimbursement | |
| from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, ExpenseGroupSettings |
Tools
Ruff
14-14:
apps.fyle.models.Reimbursementimported but unusedRemove unused import:
apps.fyle.models.Reimbursement(F401)
Ashutosh619-sudo
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py
Outdated
| expense_group_settings = ExpenseGroupSettings.objects.get(workspace_id=workspace_id) | ||
| filter_credit_expenses = get_filter_credit_expenses(expense_group_settings=expense_group_settings) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
do both of these at parent func so that we don't repeat db calls for every export
apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py
Outdated
| @@ -615,13 +628,13 @@ def create_bill_payment(workspace_id): | |||
| fyle_credentials = FyleCredential.objects.get(workspace_id=workspace_id) | |||
|
|
|||
| platform = PlatformConnector(fyle_credentials) | |||
| platform.reimbursements.sync() | |||
| # platform.reimbursements.sync() | |||
Ashutosh619-sudo
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py (3 hunks)
- tests/test_quickbooks_online/test_tasks.py (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py
173-173: Within an
exceptclause, raise exceptions withraise ... from errorraise ... from Noneto distinguish them from errors in exception handling(B904)
239-241: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
240-241: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
244-247: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
253-253: Avoid extraneous parentheses
Remove extraneous parentheses
(UP034)
274-275: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
278-279: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
316-316: Comparison to
Noneshould becond is NoneReplace with
cond is None(E711)
316-316: Use implicit references for positional format fields
Remove explicit positional indices
(UP030)
316-316: Use f-string instead of
formatcallConvert to f-string
(UP032)
639-639: Use f-string instead of
formatcallConvert to f-string
(UP032)
tests/test_quickbooks_online/test_tasks.py
778-778: Comparison to
Noneshould becond is NoneReplace with
cond is None(E711)
779-779: Avoid equality comparisons to
True; useif qbo_credentials.is_expired:for truth checksReplace with
qbo_credentials.is_expired(E712)
836-836: Avoid equality comparisons to
True; useif bill.paid_on_qbo:for truth checksReplace with
bill.paid_on_qbo(E712)
837-837: Avoid equality comparisons to
True; useif bill.payment_synced:for truth checksReplace with
bill.payment_synced(E712)
Additional comments not posted (2)
apps/quickbooks_online/tasks.py (1)
574-594: Review of updated functioncheck_expenses_reimbursement_status.The function has been updated to handle more complex scenarios involving expense reimbursement statuses. The addition of
workspace_id,platform, andfilter_credit_expensesparameters allows for more flexible and dynamic handling of expense data. The function now checks if expenses are paid on Fyle and updates thepaid_on_fyleflag accordingly.Ensure that the function is covered by unit tests, especially with the new logic added.
tests/test_quickbooks_online/test_tasks.py (1)
668-668: Review of new test mocks forcheck_expenses_reimbursement_status.The addition of mocks for
fyle_integrations_platform_connector.apis.Expenses.getis appropriate for simulating the API behavior in tests. Ensure these mocks return values that test both the true and false paths through the function logic, including edge cases.Also applies to: 708-708
| from fyle_accounting_mappings.models import DestinationAttribute, EmployeeMapping, ExpenseAttribute, Mapping | ||
| from fyle_integrations_platform_connector import PlatformConnector | ||
| from qbosdk.exceptions import InvalidTokenError, WrongParamsError | ||
|
|
||
| from apps.fyle.actions import update_expenses_in_progress | ||
| from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, Reimbursement | ||
| from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, ExpenseGroupSettings |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused import and approve new import.
The import ExpenseGroupSettings is correctly added and used in the updated function. However, as per previous reviews and static analysis, the Reimbursement import is unused and should be removed to clean up the code.
- from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, ExpenseGroupSettings, Reimbursement
+ from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, ExpenseGroupSettingsCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, ExpenseGroupSettings | |
| from apps.fyle.models import Expense, ExpenseGroup, ExpenseGroupSettings |
Ashutosh619-sudo
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
Ashutosh619-sudo
added
the
deploy
Ashutosh619-sudo
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
* Changing process bill payments * comment resolved and test fix * dec code cov
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests
test_create_bill_paymentandtest_post_bill_payment_exceptionsfunctions.