Fix: CCC Tax #617
Fix: CCC Tax #617
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@ruuushhh has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant System
participant QuickBooks API
User->>System: Create Purchase with Multiple Line Items
System->>System: Call purchase_object_payload with line items
System->>System: Calculate tax rates for each line item
System->>QuickBooks API: Send processed payload
QuickBooks API->>System: Acknowledge receipt
User->>System: Create Credit Card Purchase
System->>System: Call __construct_credit_card_purchase with line items
System->>System: Handle negative amounts for credits
System->>QuickBooks API: Send credit card purchase payload
QuickBooks API->>System: Acknowledge receipt
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/quickbooks_online/utils.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
apps/quickbooks_online/utils.py (4)
488-488: The variabletax_rate_refsis initialized as an empty list which is appropriate for its use in accumulating tax rate references. This is a good practice as it clearly defines the variable's role at its point of use.
819-824: The handling of negative amounts in__construct_credit_card_purchaseis correctly implemented by checking if the amount is negative and then converting it to a positive value. This is crucial for ensuring the accuracy of financial transactions.
486-487: The variablegeneral_mappingsis declared using type annotation but without an assignment operator. This might cause a syntax error in Python. Consider initializing it properly.- general_mappings: GeneralMapping = GeneralMapping.objects.filter(workspace_id=self.workspace_id).first() + general_mappings = GeneralMapping.objects.filter(workspace_id=self.workspace_id).first()Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Line range hint
480-516: The methodpurchase_object_payloadhas been updated to handle multiple line items and tax calculations. Ensure that all calls to this method have been updated to pass a list of line items instead of a single line item.Verification successful
The verification script output shows that the
purchase_object_payloadmethod is called in three places withinapps/quickbooks_online/utils.py. Each call passes a variable namedlineorlinesas the second argument, which aligns with the updated method signature expecting a list of line items.
qbo_expense_payload = self.purchase_object_payload(qbo_expense, line, account_ref=qbo_expense.expense_account_id, payment_type='Cash')cheque_payload = self.purchase_object_payload(cheque, line, account_ref=cheque.bank_account_id, payment_type='Check')credit_card_purchase_payload = self.purchase_object_payload(credit_card_purchase, lines, account_ref=credit_card_purchase.ccc_account_id, payment_type='CreditCard', doc_number=credit_card_purchase.credit_card_purchase_number, credit=credit)These calls indicate that the method is being used correctly with the new signature.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `purchase_object_payload` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type python $'purchase_object_payload'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `purchase_object_payload` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg 'purchase_object_payload'Length of output: 1297
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the arguments passed to `purchase_object_payload` in each call. # Extract lines where `purchase_object_payload` is called and display the surrounding context. rg 'purchase_object_payload' -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 3614
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/quickbooks_online/utils.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/quickbooks_online/utils.py
|
|
ruuushhh
added
deploy
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements