Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: bug fix for support qbd (minor fix) #102

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

anishfyle
Copy link
Contributor

@anishfyle anishfyle commented Aug 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced project synchronization to ensure project names are consistently formatted with sub-projects.
    • Improved clarity in cost center synchronization by explicitly using cost center names and IDs for attribute referencing.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined logic in the synchronization methods to avoid discrepancies in project and cost center data collection.
  • Tests

    • Updated test structure to align with new nested API response format, enhancing test robustness and accuracy.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance the functionality of project synchronization and cost center management in the application. The sync_projects method now formats project names consistently, while the sync_cost_center method clarifies attribute handling by explicitly using the cost center's name and ID. Additionally, the test structure is improved to match these changes, boosting overall data accuracy and test robustness.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/mappings/connector.py Updated sync_projects to always format project names, regardless of sub-project existence. Modified sync_cost_center to use cost_center['name'] and cost_center['id'] for clarity.
tests/test_mapping/test_connector.py Changed mock_response structure in test_sync_cost_center to a more complex nested format. Updated assertions to align with this new structure for improved test robustness.
.github/workflows/codecov.yml Transitioned from docker-compose to docker compose syntax in the GitHub Actions workflow, maintaining functionality while modernizing command usage.

Poem

In the fields where projects grow,
A rabbit hops with joy aglow.
Names now shine, clear as day,
Cost centers dance in a bright array.
With each change, we leap and bound,
A better world of code we've found! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 1 ❌ 0 🔥 8.455s ⏱️

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 1 ❌ 0 🔥 8.466s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/mappings/connector.py (1)

140-140: Remove redundant blank line.

The blank line is unnecessary and can be removed for better readability.

- 
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3bfbd2 and c5babca.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/mappings/connector.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/mappings/connector.py (1)

151-152: LGTM!

The changes improve clarity by explicitly referencing cost_center['name'] and cost_center['id'].

'source_id': project['id']
})

project['name'] = '{0} / {1}'.format(project['name'], project['sub_project'])
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure project['sub_project'] exists before formatting.

The change unconditionally formats the project name with its sub-project. Ensure that project['sub_project'] always exists to avoid potential KeyError.

- project['name'] = '{0} / {1}'.format(project['name'], project['sub_project'])
+ project['name'] = '{0} / {1}'.format(project['name'], project.get('sub_project', ''))
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
project['name'] = '{0} / {1}'.format(project['name'], project['sub_project'])
project['name'] = '{0} / {1}'.format(project['name'], project.get('sub_project', ''))

apps/mappings/connector.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 1 ❌ 0 🔥 9.022s ⏱️

'source_id': project['id']
})

if project['name'] not in existing_projects:
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indent fixed

'value': cost_center,
'source_id': cost_center
'value': cost_center['name'],
'source_id': cost_center['id']
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

name and id went missing, in concurrent prs, fixed this

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 1 ❌ 0 🔥 8.849s ⏱️

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 8.654s ⏱️

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 8.279s ⏱️

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 8.185s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
tests/test_mapping/test_connector.py (1)

78-80: Ensure correct length comparison and source value assertion.

The length comparison in the assertion should be updated to compare with the length of mock_response[0][0]['data'] instead of mock_response[0][0].

  • Update the length comparison assertion to:
    assert len(qbd_mappings) == len(mock_response[0][0]['data'])
Analysis chain

Ensure correct length comparison and source value assertion.

The assertion for the length of qbd_mappings has been updated to compare with mock_response[0][0]. Ensure this is the correct comparison. The source value assertion has been updated to access mock_response[0][0]['data'][i]['name'].

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of length comparison and source value assertion.

# Test: Search for the function definition and its usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new structure.
rg --type python -A 10 $'def test_sync_cost_center'

Length of output: 83


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of length comparison and source value assertion.

# Test: Search for the function definition and its usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new structure.
rg --glob '*.py' -A 10 $'def test_sync_cost_center'

Length of output: 867


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the full function definition of `test_sync_cost_center` from `tests/test_mapping/test_connector.py`.

# Search for the function definition and display the entire function.
rg --glob '*.py' -A 50 $'def test_sync_cost_center' tests/test_mapping/test_connector.py

Length of output: 2208

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5babca and 0b1d53b.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/mappings/connector.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_mapping/test_connector.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/mappings/connector.py
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/test_mapping/test_connector.py (1)

53-69: Verify the nested structure of mock_response.

The structure of mock_response has been updated to a more complex nested format. Ensure that this structure aligns with the expected API response format.

Verification successful

The nested structure of mock_response and corresponding assertions are correct and consistent with the expected functionality.

  • The mock_response structure aligns with the expected API response format.
  • The assertions correctly reflect the new structure of mock_response.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the structure of `mock_response` aligns with the expected API response format.

# Test: Search for the function definition and its usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new structure.
rg --type python -A 10 $'def test_sync_cost_center'

Length of output: 83


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the structure of `mock_response` aligns with the expected API response format.

# Test: Search for the function definition and its usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new structure.
rg --type py -A 10 $'def test_sync_cost_center'

Length of output: 863


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Retrieve the complete `test_sync_cost_center` function for detailed review.

# Search for the complete function definition and its body.
rg --type py -A 50 $'def test_sync_cost_center'

Length of output: 4054

@anishfyle anishfyle added the deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging label Aug 5, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 8.537s ⏱️

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 1 ❌ 0 🔥 8.674s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b1d53b and 4a0e4c0.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/codecov.yml (1 hunks)
  • apps/mappings/connector.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/codecov.yml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/mappings/connector.py

@anishfyle anishfyle added deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging and removed deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging labels Aug 5, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 8.704s ⏱️

@anishfyle anishfyle merged commit 97759a5 into master Aug 5, 2024
4 checks passed
anishfyle added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
* fix: bug fix for support qbd (minor fix)

* remove print

* fix indent issues

* some minor fixes for cost center

* fixtures updated

* fixed tests

* fixed few things basis on structure

* docker compose

* fixed minor indents and dicts

* updated test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants