Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Version bump for fyle-accounting-mapping fields #690

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

Ashutosh619-sudo
Copy link
Contributor

@Ashutosh619-sudo Ashutosh619-sudo commented Dec 26, 2024

Description

Please add PR description here, add screenshots if needed

Clickup

Please add link here
https://app.clickup.com/1864988/v/l/6-901605343641-1

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the version of the fyle-accounting-mappings package to 1.36.2.
  • New Features
    • Enhanced the mapping_settings table by adding created_by and updated_by columns for user tracking.
    • Updated data import command to accommodate new columns in the mapping_settings table.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes an update to the requirements.txt file, changing the version of the fyle-accounting-mappings package from 1.36.1 to 1.36.2. Additionally, modifications have been made to the SQL schema in reset_db.sql, where two new columns, created_by and updated_by, were added to the public.mapping_settings table. The COPY command for this table has also been updated to incorporate these new columns, and the sequence for public.django_migrations_id_seq has been incremented from 212 to 213.

Changes

File Change Summary
requirements.txt Updated fyle-accounting-mappings package version from 1.36.1 to 1.36.2
tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql Modified public.mapping_settings table by adding created_by character varying(255) and updated_by character varying(255) columns; updated COPY command to include new columns; incremented public.django_migrations_id_seq from 212 to 213

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, we hop with glee,
Upgrading our packages, oh so free!
New fields for tracking, we add with care,
A little more info, in the database lair.
Version two is here, let’s celebrate bright,
With every small change, our code takes flight! 📦✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dd87813 and f11128f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (4)

8018-8018: LGTM! Migration entry is properly formatted.

The migration entry follows Django conventions and maintains the correct sequence order.


11930-11930: LGTM! Sequence value is consistent.

The sequence value has been properly incremented to match the new migration ID.


1264-1266: LGTM! Consider adding NOT NULL constraints.

The addition of audit trail columns created_by and updated_by follows good practices. However, consider whether these columns should have NOT NULL constraints to ensure data integrity.

Let's check if other audit-related columns in the schema have NOT NULL constraints:


11727-11732: LGTM! Verify data consistency across environments.

The COPY command has been properly updated to include the new audit columns. The use of \N for NULL values is correct PostgreSQL syntax.

Let's verify the column count matches across all data rows:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to understand the table structure and expected column count.


Data consistency issue detected in COPY statements

The verification revealed varying field counts across data rows, but this appears to be normal as the COPY statements belong to different tables with varying column counts. Looking at the COPY commands and their corresponding data:

  • Most rows (4,990) have 12 fields, which matches tables like destination_attributes
  • The rows with 10 fields match simpler tables like expense_groups
  • The rows with 14 fields correspond to django_q_schedule
  • Other variations (29, 32, 47 fields) match complex tables like expenses and configurations

Each table's COPY command properly matches its data structure, and the \N NULL values are consistently placed. The varying field counts are expected and correct based on the table definitions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Count fields in each COPY data row to ensure consistency
rg "^[0-9].*\\t.*\\t.*\\\\N.*\\\\N$" tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql | awk -F'\t' '{print NF}' | sort | uniq -c

Length of output: 191


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the COPY command and its table name
rg "^COPY.*FROM stdin;" tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql -B2 | grep "COPY"

# Get a sample of rows with different field counts
echo "=== Sample row with 10 fields ==="
rg "^[0-9].*\\t.*\\t.*\\\\N.*\\\\N$" tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql | awk -F'\t' 'NF==10 {print; exit}'

echo "=== Sample row with 12 fields ==="
rg "^[0-9].*\\t.*\\t.*\\\\N.*\\\\N$" tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql | awk -F'\t' 'NF==12 {print; exit}'

echo "=== Sample row with 14 fields ==="
rg "^[0-9].*\\t.*\\t.*\\\\N.*\\\\N$" tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql | awk -F'\t' 'NF==14 {print; exit}'

Length of output: 10946


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Extra Small PR label Dec 26, 2024
Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
236 0 💤 47 ❌ 21 🔥 31.636s ⏱️

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/S Small PR and removed size/XS Extra Small PR labels Dec 26, 2024
Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
236 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 26.625s ⏱️

@Ashutosh619-sudo Ashutosh619-sudo merged commit 1a1bf66 into master Dec 26, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/S Small PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants