Feat: Add created_at, created_at to workspace_schedule and workspaces… #688
Conversation
Ashutosh619-sudo
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the workspace and user models, focusing on enhancing the tracking of record creation and modification times. New timestamp fields ( Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Workspace
participant NetSuiteCredentials
User ->> NetSuiteCredentials: Create association
NetSuiteCredentials -->> Workspace: Link to workspace
NetSuiteCredentials ->> NetSuiteCredentials: Set timestamps
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/users/models.py (1)
25-25: Consider PROTECT instead of CASCADE for workspace deletionUsing CASCADE for workspace deletion might lead to unintended user access record deletions. Consider using PROTECT to prevent accidental deletion of workspace-user relationships.
- workspace = models.ForeignKey('workspaces.Workspace', on_delete=models.CASCADE) + workspace = models.ForeignKey('workspaces.Workspace', on_delete=models.PROTECT)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/users/models.py(1 hunks)apps/workspaces/models.py(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/workspaces/models.py (1)
98-99: LGTM! Timestamp fields added correctly
The timestamp fields are properly implemented with appropriate auto_now_add and auto_now settings.
apps/users/models.py
Outdated
| class WorkspaceUser(models.Model): | ||
| workspace = models.ForeignKey('workspaces.Workspace', on_delete=models.CASCADE) | ||
| user = models.ForeignKey('User', on_delete=models.CASCADE) | ||
| created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, help_text='Created at datetime') | ||
| updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True, help_text='Updated at datetime') | ||
|
|
||
| class Meta: | ||
| db_table = 'workspaces_user' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add unique constraint and indexes to WorkspaceUser model
The model structure looks good, but consider these essential improvements:
- Add a unique constraint to prevent duplicate workspace-user combinations
- Add database indexes for foreign key fields to improve query performance
Apply this diff:
class WorkspaceUser(models.Model):
- workspace = models.ForeignKey('workspaces.Workspace', on_delete=models.CASCADE)
- user = models.ForeignKey('User', on_delete=models.CASCADE)
+ workspace = models.ForeignKey('workspaces.Workspace', on_delete=models.CASCADE, db_index=True)
+ user = models.ForeignKey('User', on_delete=models.CASCADE, db_index=True)
created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, help_text='Created at datetime')
updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True, help_text='Updated at datetime')
class Meta:
db_table = 'workspaces_user'
+ unique_together = ('workspace', 'user')📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| class WorkspaceUser(models.Model): | |
| workspace = models.ForeignKey('workspaces.Workspace', on_delete=models.CASCADE) | |
| user = models.ForeignKey('User', on_delete=models.CASCADE) | |
| created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, help_text='Created at datetime') | |
| updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True, help_text='Updated at datetime') | |
| class Meta: | |
| db_table = 'workspaces_user' | |
| class WorkspaceUser(models.Model): | |
| workspace = models.ForeignKey('workspaces.Workspace', on_delete=models.CASCADE, db_index=True) | |
| user = models.ForeignKey('User', on_delete=models.CASCADE, db_index=True) | |
| created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, help_text='Created at datetime') | |
| updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True, help_text='Updated at datetime') | |
| class Meta: | |
| db_table = 'workspaces_user' | |
| unique_together = ('workspace', 'user') |
apps/workspaces/models.py
Outdated
| @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ class Workspace(models.Model): | |||
| """ | |||
| id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True, help_text='Unique Id to identify a workspace') | |||
| name = models.CharField(max_length=255, help_text='Name of the workspace') | |||
| user = models.ManyToManyField(User, help_text='Reference to users table') | |||
| user = models.ManyToManyField(User, help_text='Reference to users table', through='users.WorkspaceUser') | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Migration ordering needs to be fixed
The WorkspaceUser model exists in apps/users/models.py but is not yet migrated. The through relationship in the Workspace model references this model, but there's no migration for it yet. This could cause runtime errors.
- Create and apply a migration for the
WorkspaceUsermodel before applying the workspace model changes - The migration should include both the model creation and the
db_table = 'workspaces_user'setting
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify migration ordering
The through model specification looks correct. Ensure that the migration for the WorkspaceUser model is applied before this change to prevent runtime errors.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check migration dependencies
fd -e py . migrations/ --exec grep -l "WorkspaceUser\|through"
Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find all migration files in the repository
fd -e py . -t f | grep -i "migrations"
# Then, let's look for WorkspaceUser model definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class WorkspaceUser'
# And also check for any through relationships in models
rg "through\s*=" -A 2
Length of output: 8374
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the WorkspaceUser model definition in users app
cat apps/users/models.py
# Let's also check the migration history in users app to see if WorkspaceUser is already defined
cat apps/users/migrations/0001_initial.py
Length of output: 2320
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if WorkspaceUser is defined in a subsequent migration
cat apps/users/migrations/0002_auto_20201228_0754.py
Length of output: 365
Ashutosh619-sudo
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1138.py (2)
5-5: Remove unused importThe
django.db.models.deletionimport is not used in this migration.-import django.db.models.deletion🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
5-5:
django.db.models.deletionimported but unusedRemove unused import:
django.db.models.deletion(F401)
19-19: Consider making timestamp fields non-nullableThe
created_atandupdated_atfields are set as nullable (null=True). Since these fields useauto_now_add=Trueandauto_now=True, they will always have a value. Consider making them non-nullable for better data integrity.- field=models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, help_text='Created at datetime', null=True), + field=models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, help_text='Created at datetime'),Also applies to: 24-24, 29-29, 34-34
apps/workspaces/models.py (2)
29-37: Consider adding unique constraint and Meta optionsThe
WorkspaceUsermodel looks good, but consider adding:
- A unique constraint to prevent duplicate user-workspace relationships
- Additional Meta options for better model management
class Meta: db_table = 'workspaces_user' + unique_together = ('workspace', 'user') + ordering = ['-created_at'] + verbose_name = 'Workspace User' + verbose_name_plural = 'Workspace Users'
Line range hint
29-108: Consider adding database indexesGiven that these models will likely be queried based on timestamps and relationships, consider adding appropriate indexes for better query performance.
class Meta: db_table = 'workspaces_user' + indexes = [ + models.Index(fields=['created_at']), + models.Index(fields=['workspace', 'user']), + ] class Meta: db_table = 'workspace_schedules' + indexes = [ + models.Index(fields=['created_at']), + models.Index(fields=['workspace']), + ]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/users/models.py(1 hunks)apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1138.py(1 hunks)apps/workspaces/models.py(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/users/models.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1138.py
5-5: django.db.models.deletion imported but unused
Remove unused import: django.db.models.deletion
(F401)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1138.py (1)
36-40: Verify WorkspaceUser model existence
The migration alters the user field to use WorkspaceUser as a through model. This is a critical change that requires the WorkspaceUser model to exist before this migration runs.
Let's verify the migration dependencies:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if WorkspaceUser model exists in previous migrations
fd -e py . migrations/ --exec grep -l "class WorkspaceUser"
# Check migration history for workspaces app
fd -e py . apps/workspaces/migrations/ | sortapps/workspaces/models.py (2)
44-44: LGTM: ManyToManyField through relationship
The modification to use WorkspaceUser as the through model is correctly implemented.
107-108: LGTM: Timestamp fields addition
The addition of timestamp fields to WorkspaceSchedule is consistent with other models in the codebase.
Ashutosh619-sudo
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
|
Ashutosh619-sudo
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (1)
11816-11817: Consider preserving historical creation timesWhile the implementation works, setting the same timestamp (
2024-12-19 18:13:18...) for all existing records doesn't reflect their actual creation history. Consider:
- Using record creation dates from audit logs if available
- Or adding a comment in the migration to document this as a baseline timestamp
Also applies to: 11836-11839
apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1808.py (1)
23-27: Consider data consistency for WorkspacesUser timestampsSimilar to WorkspaceSchedule, the timestamp fields for
workspacesuserare nullable. The approach is consistent with the other model changes.Consider the same data migration approach for existing WorkspacesUser records.
Also applies to: 28-32
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
apps/workspaces/migrations/0001_initial.py(1 hunks)apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1808.py(1 hunks)apps/workspaces/models.py(2 hunks)tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql(9 hunks)tests/test_workspaces/data.json(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/workspaces/models.py
🔇 Additional comments (9)
apps/workspaces/migrations/0001_initial.py (2)
Line range hint 8-8: Verify migration sequence
This file is marked as the initial migration (initial = True) but appears to be modifying existing models. This could cause issues if there are existing migrations or data in the database.
Please verify:
- Is this truly the first migration for this app?
- If not, remove
initial = Trueand ensure proper migration dependencies.
Let's check the migration history:
✅ Verification successful
Migration sequence is correct
The file 0001_initial.py is indeed the first migration in the sequence, followed by 41 subsequent migrations. The migration history shows a proper sequential order starting from 0001_initial.py, indicating this is correctly marked as the initial migration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing migrations
fd --type f ".*\.py$" apps/workspaces/migrations/ | sort
Length of output: 2883
78-82: Verify data migration for existing workspaces
The implementation of the many-to-many relationship looks correct. However, since this is modifying the Workspace model's user relationship, we need to ensure that existing workspace-user relationships are properly migrated.
Let's check for any existing data migration files:
✅ Verification successful
No data migration needed - relationship is part of initial migration
The many-to-many relationship between Workspace and User models is properly set up in the initial migration (0001_initial.py). The migration creates:
- The
WorkspacesUserthrough model with proper foreign keys - The many-to-many relationship field on the Workspace model
- Appropriate unique constraints on the through table
Since this is part of the initial migration, there is no need for additional data migration as this structure would be in place from the beginning of the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for data migrations related to workspace-user relationships
fd --type f ".*_auto_.*\.py$" apps/workspaces/migrations/ | xargs grep -l "user"
Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the auto migration file to understand the user-related changes
cat apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1808.py
Length of output: 1178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other migrations that might handle the workspace-user relationship data
cat apps/workspaces/migrations/0001_initial.py
Length of output: 4234
tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (4)
1935-1937: Schema changes look good!
The addition of created_at and updated_at timestamp columns to both tables is well-structured and follows database best practices by:
- Using
timestamp with time zonetype for proper timezone handling - Maintaining consistency across both tables
Also applies to: 2017-2019
2659-2662: Permission setup is complete and follows Django conventions
The new permissions for workspaces_user are properly configured with:
- All CRUD operations (add, change, delete, view)
- Correct content type registration
- Standard Django permission naming
Also applies to: 7796-7796
8012-8012: Migration record is properly sequenced
The migration 0042_auto_20241219_1808 is correctly added to the migration history with an appropriate timestamp.
11861-11861: Sequence values are properly updated
The sequence values are correctly incremented to account for the new records:
auth_permission_id_seq: 192 (matches new permissions)django_content_type_id_seq: 48 (matches new content type)django_migrations_id_seq: 209 (matches new migration)
Also applies to: 11917-11924
apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1808.py (1)
13-17: Consider data consistency for WorkspaceSchedule timestamps
The timestamp fields for workspaceschedule are added as nullable, which is good for existing records. However, consider setting default values for better data consistency.
Consider adding a data migration to set initial values for existing records:
from django.utils import timezone
def set_initial_timestamps(apps, schema_editor):
WorkspaceSchedule = apps.get_model('workspaces', 'WorkspaceSchedule')
now = timezone.now()
WorkspaceSchedule.objects.filter(created_at__isnull=True).update(
created_at=now,
updated_at=now
)Also applies to: 18-22
tests/test_workspaces/data.json (2)
58-60: Test data timestamps are properly formatted
The added timestamp fields use consistent ISO 8601 format and match the timestamps used in the parent workspace object, which is good for testing data consistency.
58-60: Verify API/serializer updates for new fields
The timestamp fields have been added to the test data, but we should verify if corresponding updates are needed in API views and serializers.
✅ Verification successful
No API/serializer updates needed for timestamp fields
The timestamp fields (created_at and updated_at) are already properly handled in the codebase:
- They are defined in the
WorkspaceSchedulemodel's migration file withauto_now_addandauto_nowrespectively - The
WorkspaceScheduleSerializerusesfields = '__all__'which automatically includes these timestamp fields - These are standard Django model timestamp fields that are handled automatically by the framework
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for workspace schedule serializers and viewsets
rg -l "class.*WorkspaceScheduleSerializer|class.*WorkspaceScheduleViewSet"
# Check for workspaces user serializers and viewsets
rg -l "class.*WorkspacesUserSerializer|class.*WorkspacesUserViewSet"
Length of output: 178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual serializer implementation to see if it handles these fields
ast-grep --pattern 'class WorkspaceScheduleSerializer($$$)' apps/workspaces/serializers.py
# Let's also check for any model definitions related to workspace schedules
ast-grep --pattern 'class WorkspaceSchedule($$$)'
# Check for any API views or viewsets handling workspace schedules
rg "WorkspaceSchedule" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 21120
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the WorkspaceSchedule model definition to see if it has these timestamp fields
ast-grep --pattern 'class WorkspaceSchedule($$$)' apps/workspaces/models.py
# Let's also check for any migrations that might have added these fields
rg "created_at|updated_at" apps/workspaces/migrations/*workspaceschedule*.py
Length of output: 392
| migrations.CreateModel( | ||
| name='WorkspacesUser', | ||
| fields=[ | ||
| ('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')), | ||
| ('user', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.DO_NOTHING, to=settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL)), | ||
| ('workspace', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.DO_NOTHING, to='workspaces.workspace')), | ||
| ], | ||
| options={ | ||
| 'db_table': 'workspaces_user', | ||
| 'unique_together': {('workspace', 'user')}, | ||
| }, | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review foreign key deletion behavior and add timestamp fields
Several improvements are needed for the WorkspacesUser model:
- The
DO_NOTHINGdeletion strategy is risky as it can lead to database integrity issues. Consider usingCASCADEorPROTECT. - Missing
created_atandupdated_atfields that were mentioned in the summary. - Missing helpful field descriptions via
help_text.
Apply these changes:
migrations.CreateModel(
name='WorkspacesUser',
fields=[
('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),
- ('user', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.DO_NOTHING, to=settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL)),
- ('workspace', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.DO_NOTHING, to='workspaces.workspace')),
+ ('user', models.ForeignKey(
+ on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE,
+ to=settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL,
+ help_text='Reference to User model'
+ )),
+ ('workspace', models.ForeignKey(
+ on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE,
+ to='workspaces.workspace',
+ help_text='Reference to Workspace model'
+ )),
+ ('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, help_text='Created at datetime')),
+ ('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True, help_text='Updated at datetime')),
],
options={
'db_table': 'workspaces_user',
'unique_together': {('workspace', 'user')},
},
),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.CreateModel( | |
| name='WorkspacesUser', | |
| fields=[ | |
| ('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')), | |
| ('user', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.DO_NOTHING, to=settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL)), | |
| ('workspace', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.DO_NOTHING, to='workspaces.workspace')), | |
| ], | |
| options={ | |
| 'db_table': 'workspaces_user', | |
| 'unique_together': {('workspace', 'user')}, | |
| }, | |
| ), | |
| migrations.CreateModel( | |
| name='WorkspacesUser', | |
| fields=[ | |
| ('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')), | |
| ('user', models.ForeignKey( | |
| on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, | |
| to=settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL, | |
| help_text='Reference to User model' | |
| )), | |
| ('workspace', models.ForeignKey( | |
| on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, | |
| to='workspaces.workspace', | |
| help_text='Reference to Workspace model' | |
| )), | |
| ('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, help_text='Created at datetime')), | |
| ('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True, help_text='Updated at datetime')), | |
| ], | |
| options={ | |
| 'db_table': 'workspaces_user', | |
| 'unique_together': {('workspace', 'user')}, | |
| }, | |
| ), |
| error_count integer, | ||
| created_at timestamp with time zone, | ||
| updated_at timestamp with time zone |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding constraints for timestamp columns
To ensure data integrity, consider adding the following constraints:
- NOT NULL constraints for both columns
- CHECK constraint to ensure updated_at >= created_at
- Default values using CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Example constraints:
ALTER TABLE public.workspace_schedules
ALTER COLUMN created_at SET NOT NULL,
ALTER COLUMN updated_at SET NOT NULL,
ALTER COLUMN created_at SET DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
ALTER COLUMN updated_at SET DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
ADD CONSTRAINT workspace_schedules_timestamp_check
CHECK (updated_at >= created_at);
ALTER TABLE public.workspaces_user
ALTER COLUMN created_at SET NOT NULL,
ALTER COLUMN updated_at SET NOT NULL,
ALTER COLUMN created_at SET DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
ALTER COLUMN updated_at SET DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
ADD CONSTRAINT workspaces_user_timestamp_check
CHECK (updated_at >= created_at);Also applies to: 2017-2019
Ashutosh619-sudo
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
| @@ -63,4 +62,23 @@ class Migration(migrations.Migration): | |||
| name='workspace', | |||
| table='workspaces', | |||
| ), | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why does this model have changes? it won't get applied in DB since this is already applied
apps/workspaces/models.py
Outdated
| workspace = models.ForeignKey('Workspace', models.DO_NOTHING) | ||
| user = models.ForeignKey('users.User', models.DO_NOTHING) | ||
| created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, null=True, help_text='Created at datetime') | ||
| updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True, null=True, help_text='Updated at datetime') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
updated at doesn't make sense for workspaces_user as we don't update anything
Ashutosh619-sudo
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1808.py (2)
18-22: Updated_at field is well-defined but remember to handle conflict resolution.“auto_now=True” ensures the field is updated every time the record is saved. Keep in mind that frequent saves with minimal changes can cause unnecessary writes; this is usually acceptable but might need to be addressed if large volumes of usage cause performance concerns.
23-32: Evaluate indexing strategy for the new column.Adding “created_at” to “workspaces_user” makes sense for auditing. If you plan to run queries based on creation time, consider adding an index on this column to optimize lookups (e.g. fetching records by created date).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
apps/workspaces/migrations/0001_initial.py(1 hunks)apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1808.py(1 hunks)apps/workspaces/models.py(1 hunks)tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql
- apps/workspaces/models.py
- apps/workspaces/migrations/0001_initial.py
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/workspaces/migrations/0042_auto_20241219_1808.py (2)
13-17: Auto-managed timestamp fields look good.
Using “auto_now_add” for the created_at field is a typically recommended approach. The help text is also clear and well-documented.
8-10: Confirm the migration dependency ordering.
The dependency on “0041_configuration_is_attachment_upload_enabled” likely reflects an existing stable state of the schema. Just confirm that this new migration doesn’t conflict with other recently merged migrations that may introduce overlapping schema changes in the “workspaces” app.
Run the following script to gather relevant migration files and check for potential ordering or duplication issues:
✅ Verification successful
The previous command might have failed due to escaping issues. Let's try a different approach by:
- Listing all migration files to see the sequence
- Looking at the content of migrations around 0041 and 0042 to verify dependencies and potential conflicts
Migration dependency ordering is correct
The migration chain is properly ordered:
- 0039_configuration_je_single_credit_line.py
- 0040_alter_configuration_change_accounting_period.py
- 0041_configuration_is_attachment_upload_enabled.py
- 0042_auto_20241219_1808.py
The dependency on '0041_configuration_is_attachment_upload_enabled' is correct as it's the most recent migration before this one, and there are no other migrations between them that could cause conflicts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Searching all migration dependencies that reference '0041_configuration_is_attachment_upload_enabled'
rg -A 3 $'dependencies = \\[\\s*\\(\'workspaces\', \'0041_configuration_is_attachment_upload_enabled\'\\)'
Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all migration files in workspaces app to check ordering
fd "^\d{4}.*\.py$" apps/workspaces/migrations/ --exec ls -la {} \;
# Show content of migrations around 0041 and 0042 to verify dependencies
echo "=== Content of relevant migration files ==="
fd "^004[0-2].*\.py$" apps/workspaces/migrations/ --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 7040
Ashutosh619-sudo
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
…_user table
Description
Please add PR description here, add screenshots if needed
Clickup
Please add link here
https://app.clickup.com/1864988/v/l/li/901605343641
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
created_atandupdated_attimestamp fields to theWorkspaceSchedulemodel for improved tracking of record creation and updates.created_attimestamp field in theworkspaces_usertable.Bug Fixes
Tests