fix: delete expense_attributes_deletion_cache in workspace reset
#685
Conversation
JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifying the SQL function Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
scripts/sql/functions/reset-workspace.sql (1)
256-261: Consider documenting the purpose of deletion cache.The table name suggests it's a cache for tracking attribute deletions. Consider adding a comment explaining why this cache needs to be cleared during workspace reset and its relationship with the commented-out
expense_attributesdeletion.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
scripts/sql/functions/reset-workspace.sql(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
scripts/sql/functions/reset-workspace.sql (2)
Line range hint 1-261: Clarify the relationship with commented-out deletions.
The function contains several commented-out DELETE operations, including expense_attributes and destination_attributes. Since the new deletion is for expense_attributes_deletion_cache, could you clarify:
- Why these related tables are not being deleted?
- Is there a specific reason for keeping the base tables while clearing the cache?
- Does this change relate to a larger refactoring of how expense attributes are handled?
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a clear response about the relationship between these tables.
Commented deletions are intentionally skipped during workspace reset
The reset-workspace function is designed to clear operational data while preserving core workspace configuration. This is evident from:
- The
expense_attributestable is a core configuration table containing mappings for employees, categories, and tax groups (as seen inapps/netsuite/models.py'sdefault_expense_attributes) - The
expense_attributes_deletion_cacheis an operational table that caches deletion metadata (as seen from its schema in test fixtures) - Other commented-out deletions like
workspaces,users, andfyle_credentialsare also core configuration tables that should persist
The deletion of the cache table while preserving the main attributes table is the correct approach as the cache can be regenerated from the preserved core data.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for recent changes or discussions about these tables
# Search for recent changes to related tables
git log -p --since="3 months ago" | rg -A 5 -B 5 "expense_attributes|destination_attributes"
# Search for migration files that might explain the relationship
fd -e py ".*migration.*" | xargs rg "expense_attributes_deletion_cache|expense_attributes"
Length of output: 9659
256-261: Verify deletion order for data integrity.
The deletion of expense_attributes_deletion_cache has been added near the end of the function. While the implementation follows the established pattern, we should verify if this deletion has any dependencies with the commented-out tables (especially expense_attributes and destination_attributes).
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the dependencies between these tables.
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:
Deletion order is appropriate - no dependency concerns
The expense_attributes_deletion_cache table is independent of the commented-out tables, with:
- No foreign key constraints linking it to
expense_attributesor other tables - Only a primary key and a unique constraint on
workspace_id - Simple structure storing category and project IDs as arrays
The current position of the deletion in the reset function is appropriate as it doesn't impact data integrity.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for foreign key relationships and table dependencies
# Search for table definition and constraints
rg -A 10 "CREATE TABLE.*expense_attributes_deletion_cache"
# Search for any triggers or functions referencing this table
ast-grep --pattern 'CREATE (TRIGGER|FUNCTION).*expense_attributes_deletion_cache'
Length of output: 993
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any foreign key constraints or references between the tables
rg -A 5 "FOREIGN KEY.*expense_attributes_deletion_cache|REFERENCES.*expense_attributes_deletion_cache"
# Search for any references to expense_attributes table to understand the relationship
rg -A 10 "CREATE TABLE.*expense_attributes"
# Look for any triggers or functions that might show relationships between these tables
rg -B 2 -A 5 "expense_attributes.*expense_attributes_deletion_cache"
Length of output: 4684
|
Clickup
app.clickup.com
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes