Fix: Delete Expense Filter #632
Conversation
ruuushhh
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
ruuushhh
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
WalkthroughThis update refines the codebase by modernizing Docker commands in GitHub Actions workflows while enhancing the Fyle application's URL routing and view structure. The transition from Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant ExpenseFilterView
participant ExpenseFilterDeleteView
User->>API: Request list of expense filters
API->>ExpenseFilterView: Fetch filters
ExpenseFilterView-->>API: Return filters
API-->>User: Display filters
User->>API: Request DELETE expense filter
API->>ExpenseFilterDeleteView: Delete filter
ExpenseFilterDeleteView-->>API: Confirm deletion
API-->>User: Acknowledge deletion
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
ruuushhh
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
ruuushhh
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
ruuushhh
added
deploy
ruuushhh
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/codecov.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pytest_action.yml (1 hunks)
- apps/fyle/urls.py (2 hunks)
- apps/fyle/views.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/codecov.yml
- .github/workflows/pytest_action.yml
Additional comments not posted (2)
apps/fyle/views.py (2)
329-335: Verify the deletion logic inExpenseFilterDeleteView.The
ExpenseFilterDeleteViewclass is correctly set up as aDestroyAPIViewwith a queryset and serializer. Ensure that any custom deletion logic, if needed, is implemented in this class.
Line range hint
338-343: Ensure separation of concerns inExpenseFilterView.The
ExpenseFilterViewclass now handles only listing and creation. This separation of concerns is a good practice. Ensure that any logic previously in thedeletemethod is appropriately handled in the newExpenseFilterDeleteView.
apps/fyle/urls.py
Outdated
| @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ | |||
| path('expense_attributes/', ExpenseAttributesView.as_view(), name='expense-attributes'), | |||
| path('fyle_fields/', FyleFieldsView.as_view(), name='fyle-fields'), | |||
| path('fields/', FyleFieldsView.as_view(), name='fyle-fields-v2'), | |||
| path('expense_filters/<int:pk>/', ExpenseFilterDeleteView.as_view(), name='expense-filters'), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent naming for URL patterns.
The new URL pattern added for ExpenseFilterDeleteView uses the name 'expense-filters', which is identical to the existing pattern for ExpenseFilterView. Consider using a more descriptive name to differentiate between the two, such as 'expense-filter-delete'.
- path('expense_filters/<int:pk>/', ExpenseFilterDeleteView.as_view(), name='expense-filters'),
+ path('expense_filters/<int:pk>/', ExpenseFilterDeleteView.as_view(), name='expense-filter-delete'),Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| path('expense_filters/<int:pk>/', ExpenseFilterDeleteView.as_view(), name='expense-filters'), | |
| path('expense_filters/<int:pk>/', ExpenseFilterDeleteView.as_view(), name='expense-filter-delete'), |
ruuushhh
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
|
ruuushhh
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/fyle/urls.py (2 hunks)
- tests/test_fyle/test_views.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/fyle/urls.py
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/test_fyle/test_views.py (1)
353-360: New test case for expense filter deletion looks good!The test case successfully verifies the deletion of an expense filter by asserting a 204 status code.
* Fix: Delete Expense Filter * fix pytest" * add tests * add tests --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Actions <[email protected]>
Summary by CodeRabbit
ExpenseFilterViewinto two classes:ExpenseFilterViewfor listing and creating, andExpenseFilterDeleteViewfor deletion, improving code organization.