Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump accounting mapping version #182

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Hrishabh17
Copy link
Contributor

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 commented Dec 16, 2024

Description

Bump accounting mapping version

Clickup

https://app.clickup.com

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the version of the fyle-accounting-mappings package to 1.35.0.
  • Tests
    • Added a new test for handling scenarios without Business Central credentials, enhancing test coverage.
    • Modified existing test fixtures to allow for updating employee mappings, improving flexibility.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request involves an update to the requirements.txt file, changing the version of the fyle-accounting-mappings package from 1.34.9 to 1.35.0. Additionally, a new test function test_run_import_export_with_no_bc_creds has been added to tests/test_workspaces/test_tasks.py to verify the behavior of the run_import_export function when Business Central credentials are absent. Furthermore, modifications were made to the fixture methods in tests/test_business_central/conftest.py to enhance the flexibility of creating employee mappings.

Changes

File Change Summary
requirements.txt Updated fyle-accounting-mappings package version from 1.34.9 to 1.35.0
tests/test_workspaces/test_tasks.py Added new test function test_run_import_export_with_no_bc_creds(db) to check response when no Business Central credentials are available
tests/test_business_central/conftest.py Modified create_employee_mapping_with_employee and create_employee_mapping_with_vendor to check for existing mappings before creation

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ruuushhh

Poem

🐰 A package hop, a version leap,
From 1.34.9 to 1.35.0 we creep.
With tests anew and mappings refined,
Our code grows strong, perfectly aligned.
Hopping forward, we code with glee! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43c5c49 and 0f422e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_business_central/conftest.py (2 hunks)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 requested a review from ruuushhh December 16, 2024 08:11
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Extra Small PR label Dec 16, 2024
Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
125 0 💤 0 ❌ 1 🔥 9.378s ⏱️

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
125 0 💤 0 ❌ 1 🔥 9.836s ⏱️

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
126 0 💤 0 ❌ 1 🔥 9.628s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44f1f81 and b210fd6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_workspaces/test_tasks.py (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +325 to +329
def test_run_import_export_with_no_bc_creds(db):
workspace_id = 10
response = run_import_export(workspace_id=workspace_id)

assert response is None
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance test coverage and setup

The test appears overly simplistic compared to other test functions in this file. Consider the following improvements:

  1. Add proper workspace setup using the existing fixtures (create_temp_workspace)
  2. Document why None is the expected behavior when BC credentials are missing
  3. Verify that BusinessCentralCredentials are indeed not present
  4. Add assertions to confirm the workspace state remains unchanged

Here's a suggested implementation:

-def test_run_import_export_with_no_bc_creds(db):
-    workspace_id = 10
-    response = run_import_export(workspace_id=workspace_id)
-
-    assert response is None
+def test_run_import_export_with_no_bc_creds(
+    db,
+    create_temp_workspace,
+    add_fyle_credentials,
+    create_export_settings
+):
+    """
+    Test run_import_export when Business Central credentials are missing.
+    Expected: Function should return None without processing any exports.
+    """
+    workspace_id = 1
+
+    # Verify BC credentials don't exist
+    assert not BusinessCentralCredentials.objects.filter(workspace_id=workspace_id).exists()
+
+    # Get initial state
+    initial_export_count = AccountingExport.objects.filter(workspace_id=workspace_id).count()
+
+    response = run_import_export(workspace_id=workspace_id)
+
+    # Verify response and no changes
+    assert response is None
+    assert AccountingExport.objects.filter(workspace_id=workspace_id).count() == initial_export_count

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
126 0 💤 0 ❌ 1 🔥 9.326s ⏱️

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/S Small PR and removed size/XS Extra Small PR labels Dec 19, 2024
Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
126 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 12.976s ⏱️

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 merged commit 5abc8e8 into master Dec 19, 2024
3 checks passed
Hrishabh17 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2024
* chore: bump accounting mapping version

* Add testg

* fix flaky test

* fix flaky test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/S Small PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants