feat: implementation - connect cards input UI #3388
Conversation
WalkthroughSuperstar, listen up! 🌟 We've just crafted a powerful new component for corporate card onboarding that's going to blow your mind! This isn't just a form - it's a precision-engineered gateway for connecting corporate cards, complete with validation magic that'll make even complex card number checks look like child's play. The component handles card input with the swagger of a true hero, checking card networks, validating numbers, and guiding users through the onboarding process with style and finesse! Changes
Possibly Related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/app/fyle/spender-onboarding/spender-onboarding-connect-card-step/spender-onboarding-connect-card-step.component.html(1 hunks)src/app/fyle/spender-onboarding/spender-onboarding-connect-card-step/spender-onboarding-connect-card-step.component.scss(1 hunks)src/app/fyle/spender-onboarding/spender-onboarding-connect-card-step/spender-onboarding-connect-card-step.component.ts(1 hunks)src/app/fyle/spender-onboarding/spender-onboarding.page.scss(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/app/fyle/spender-onboarding/spender-onboarding-connect-card-step/spender-onboarding-connect-card-step.component.ts (3)
1-2: Aiyoo, these imports are rocking!
They bring in the essential Angular goodies and are nicely structured.
13-31: Super job with the constructor and inputs, da!
The readOnly and orgSettings inputs set the stage well. The isStepCompleted event emitter is a neat way to signal completion.
37-50: Validation approach is mass, boss!
Your cardNumberValidator logic is neat, especially ensuring 16 digits for Visa and Mastercard networks. This will catch user mistakes quickly.
src/app/fyle/spender-onboarding/spender-onboarding.page.scss (1)
23-25: Beguiling container height, my friend!
The &__component-container at 75% might cause layout constraints on certain screen sizes, especially if the content grows. Verify if 75% is flexible enough.
src/app/fyle/spender-onboarding/spender-onboarding-connect-card-step/spender-onboarding-connect-card-step.component.html (3)
1-7: Superb heading and subheading, da!
Clear instructions guide the user elegantly.
12-34: Icons for card type? Marana marvelous!
Conditional rendering for Visa and Mastercard is crisp. The fallback icon is a good default.
52-74: Error messages are top-tier, dear friend!
You handle each error scenario gracefully. Great for user clarity.
| private cardNetworkValidator(control: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors { | ||
| const cardNumber = control.value as string; | ||
| const cardType = this.realTimeFeedService.getCardTypeFromNumber(cardNumber); | ||
|
|
||
| if ( | ||
| (!this.isVisaRTFEnabled && cardType === CardNetworkType.VISA) || | ||
| (!this.isMastercardRTFEnabled && cardType === CardNetworkType.MASTERCARD) | ||
| ) { | ||
| return { invalidCardNetwork: true }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return null; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
One small check, thambi – what about other networks?
If your usage only supports Visa/Mastercard, that’s fine. If you might expand in the future (like adding Amex?), consider a clarifying note or a future-proof architecture.
| <ion-button | ||
| class="btn-primary connect-card__primary-cta" | ||
| fill="clear" | ||
| aria-label="Navigate back to sign in page" | ||
| role="button" | ||
| > | ||
| Continue | ||
| </ion-button> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Disable the “Continue” button if invalid, perhaps?
Currently, it’s always clickable. Disabling it when cardForm.invalid would provide a more guided UX.
<ion-button
class="btn-primary connect-card__primary-cta"
fill="clear"
aria-label="Navigate back to sign in page"
role="button"
+ [disabled]="cardForm.invalid"
>
Continue
</ion-button>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| &__body { | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| flex-direction: column; | ||
| justify-content: space-between; | ||
| height: 100%; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Double .connect-card__body definitions, la?
Lines 7–12 and 54–58 both define .connect-card__body. Merging these blocks would keep the CSS crisp and reduce confusion.
.connect-card__body {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: space-between;
height: 100%;
-}
-&__body {
- display: flex;
- flex-direction: column;
+ // additional nested rules here if needed
}Also applies to: 54-58
|
bistaastha
merged commit 278fdff
into
FYLE-86cx2t82k-implementation-controller
Preview:
ClickUp: https://app.clickup.com/t/86cx2t7xk
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Style
Bug Fixes