fix: add calculated values for mileage distance and amount #3381
Conversation
WalkthroughIn a thunderous display of code prowess, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)src/app/fyle/view-team-report/view-team-report.page.spec.ts (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
arjunaj5
changed the title
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
3 similar comments
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
1 similar comment
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| mileage_calculated_distance: null, | ||
| mileage_calculated_amount: null, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Mind it! The test coverage for these mileage properties needs attention, macha!
Looking at the codebase, I can see that while there are extensive test files for mileage functionality, the new mileage_calculated_distance and mileage_calculated_amount properties are not properly covered in the test scenarios. Here's what needs to be done:
- Add test cases in
src/app/fyle/add-edit-mileage/add-edit-mileage-*.spec.tsfiles to verify these calculated properties - Ensure both null and non-null scenarios are covered
- Include validation for these properties in the form generation tests
🔗 Analysis chain
Aiyoo, superb addition to store mileage details, but don't forget the test coverage, macha!
These fresh properties look ready to roar, but ensure you’ve got test scenarios to confirm they flex their muscles properly under all conditions.
Let me verify the test coverage for these mileage properties with style!
These commands will help us understand:
- What transaction-related test files exist
- If there are any existing mileage calculation tests
- How the transaction mock data is being used in tests
Let me analyze the results and give you a stylish verdict, mind it!
Let me check the mileage test files more deeply, mind it!
These commands will show us if the new properties are already covered in the test cases or if we need to add new ones. Let the power of testing flow through our code!
Let me check one final thing about the mileage test cases, mind it!
This command will show us the actual test implementations for mileage expenses. Let's see if they're testing these calculated properties properly!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for test files related to transactions and mileage
fd -e spec.ts -e test.ts | grep -i "transaction"
# Let's also check for any existing tests with mileage calculations
rg -i "mileage.*calculated" --type ts -g "*spec.ts" -g "*test.ts"
# Search for transaction test data usage
rg "transaction.data" --type ts -g "*spec.ts" -g "*test.ts"
Length of output: 2673
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the mileage test content, style-ah!
rg -A 10 "mileage_calculated" src/app/fyle/add-edit-mileage/add-edit-mileage-*.spec.ts
# Check the transaction mock data for mileage tests
cat src/app/core/mock-data/transaction.data.ts | grep -A 10 -B 10 "mileage_calculated"
Length of output: 23574
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual test implementations for mileage, thalaiva style!
rg -l "mileage" src/app/fyle/add-edit-mileage/add-edit-mileage-*.spec.ts | xargs cat
Length of output: 106268
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/app/fyle/view-team-report/view-team-report.page.spec.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/app/fyle/view-team-report/view-team-report.page.spec.ts
[error] 61-62: Don't focus the test.
The 'only' method is often used for debugging or during implementation. It should be removed before deploying to production.
Consider removing 'only' to ensure all tests are executed.
Unsafe fix: Remove focus from test.
(lint/suspicious/noFocusedTests)
| @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ import { ApproverReportsService } from 'src/app/core/services/platform/v1/approv | |||
| import { LaunchDarklyService } from 'src/app/core/services/launch-darkly.service'; | |||
| import { RefinerService } from 'src/app/core/services/refiner.service'; | |||
|
|
|||
| describe('ViewTeamReportPageV2', () => { | |||
| fdescribe('ViewTeamReportPageV2', () => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ayyo, Superstar! Remove the 'f' from the test block to ensure all specs run.
In Jasmine, the "f" stands for a focused test, which excludes every other test from running. Time to drop our superstar style and let all tests shine in the spotlight!
Here's how you can fix it:
- fdescribe('ViewTeamReportPageV2', () => {
+ describe('ViewTeamReportPageV2', () => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fdescribe('ViewTeamReportPageV2', () => { | |
| describe('ViewTeamReportPageV2', () => { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 61-62: Don't focus the test.
The 'only' method is often used for debugging or during implementation. It should be removed before deploying to production.
Consider removing 'only' to ensure all tests are executed.
Unsafe fix: Remove focus from test.
(lint/suspicious/noFocusedTests)
|
Clickup
https://app.clickup.com/
Code Coverage
Please add code coverage here
UI Preview
Please add screenshots for UI changes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests