Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Expose split grouping option for xero c1 #1120

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

ashwin1111
Copy link
Contributor

@ashwin1111 ashwin1111 commented Dec 12, 2024

Description

Please add PR description here, add screenshots if needed

Clickup

https://app.clickup.com/

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Simplified conditional rendering for the split expense grouping section in the export settings.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved logic for displaying UI elements based on credit card export type.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the HTML template for the xero-export-settings.component.html. The primary modification involves simplifying the conditional rendering logic for the split expense grouping section, which now solely depends on the creditCardExportType. This adjustment streamlines the control flow without altering the overall structure of the form or its bindings to the reactive form model. The user interface remains consistent with previous implementations, preserving various configuration fields.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/app/integrations/xero/xero-shared/xero-export-settings/xero-export-settings.component.html Simplified conditional rendering for split expense grouping based on creditCardExportType. No changes to form structure or public entity declarations.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

size/S

Suggested reviewers

  • DhaaraniCIT

🐰 In the fields where bunnies play,
A simpler path has come our way.
With credit cards, we now can see,
The settings bloom, so joyfully!
A hop, a jump, the changes cheer,
For Xero's exports, all is clear! 🥕


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae2b2a3 and c3e169b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/app/integrations/xero/xero-shared/xero-export-settings/xero-export-settings.component.html (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/integrations/xero/xero-shared/xero-export-settings/xero-export-settings.component.html (2)

Line range hint 194-206: LGTM! Simplified conditional rendering for split expense grouping.

The simplified condition for showing the split expense grouping field looks good. However, let's verify that removing the brandingFeatureConfig dependency doesn't affect any existing configurations.

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! Removing brandingFeatureConfig dependency is safe.

The removal of brandingFeatureConfig dependency for split expense grouping is safe because:

  1. The feature flag splitExpenseGrouping in branding configs only controls feature visibility, not the core functionality
  2. The split expense grouping is now correctly tied to the credit card export type being BANK_TRANSACTION, which is the actual business logic requirement
  3. The component still maintains other necessary branding feature flags where required (e.g., reimbursableExpenses)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any references to split expense grouping in branding config
# and verify the usage of XeroCorporateCreditCardExpensesObject.BANK_TRANSACTION

# Search for split expense grouping references in branding config
rg -l "splitExpenseGrouping" --type ts

# Search for BANK_TRANSACTION enum usage
ast-grep --pattern 'enum $_ {
  $$$
  BANK_TRANSACTION = $_
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1175


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the branding config files and feature configuration model to understand the split expense grouping configuration
rg -A 10 "splitExpenseGrouping" src/app/branding/fyle-branding-config.ts src/app/branding/c1-branding-config.ts src/app/core/models/branding/feature-configuration.model.ts

# Also check the component file to see how brandingFeatureConfig was used before
rg -A 10 "brandingFeatureConfig" src/app/integrations/xero/xero-shared/xero-export-settings/xero-export-settings.component.ts

Length of output: 5319


Line range hint 194-206: Verify the split expense grouping options configuration.

The form field configuration looks good with proper validation and UX elements. Let's verify the available options in the component class.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have found the necessary information about the split expense grouping options configuration:

Split expense grouping options are properly configured.

The form field configuration is correctly implemented with:

  • Options are defined in ExportSettingModel.getSplitExpenseGroupingOptions() with two valid choices:
    • Single Line Item (SINGLE_LINE_ITEM)
    • Multiple Line Item (MULTIPLE_LINE_ITEM)
  • Default value is set to MULTIPLE_LINE_ITEM if not specified
  • The field is properly integrated with the form control as splitExpenseGrouping
  • The feature is properly guarded by brandingFeatureConfig.featureFlags.exportSettings.splitExpenseGrouping
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the definition of splitExpenseGroupingOptions

# Search for splitExpenseGroupingOptions definition
ast-grep --pattern 'splitExpenseGroupingOptions = $_'

# Search for any enum or type definition that might be used for options
ast-grep --pattern 'export type $_ = {
  $$$
  splitExpenseGrouping?: $_
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 139


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find the splitExpenseGroupingOptions

# Search for the file content
rg -l "splitExpenseGroupingOptions" 

# Search for class definition containing splitExpenseGroupingOptions
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  splitExpenseGroupingOptions$_
  $$$
}'

# Search for any enum or constant related to split expense grouping
rg -i "split.*expense.*group" -A 3 -B 3

# Look for the component file directly
fd -e ts "xero-export-settings.component.ts"

Length of output: 57062


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Extra Small PR label Dec 12, 2024
Copy link

Unit Test Coverage % values
Statements 34.06% ( 4204 / 12342 )
Branches 27.7% ( 1213 / 4378 )
Functions 26.7% ( 923 / 3456 )
Lines 34.22% ( 4136 / 12086 )

@ashwin1111 ashwin1111 merged commit d1d596e into master Dec 12, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/XS Extra Small PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants