fix: dashboard error section fixes #1107
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
1 similar comment
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/app/shared/components/dashboard/dashboard-error-section/dashboard-error-section.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-262: Consider extracting mapping and error handling logic.The component handles multiple responsibilities. Consider:
- Extract mapping-related logic into a dedicated service
- Create a separate error handling service
- Use dependency injection for better testability
This would improve maintainability and make the code more modular.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 131-132: Missing semicolon.
(semi)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 131-131:
Missing semicolon
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/app/shared/components/dashboard/dashboard-error-section/dashboard-error-section.component.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/app/shared/components/dashboard/dashboard-error-section/dashboard-error-section.component.ts
[error] 131-132: Missing semicolon.
(semi)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
src/app/shared/components/dashboard/dashboard-error-section/dashboard-error-section.component.ts
[failure] 131-131:
Missing semicolon
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/app/shared/components/dashboard/dashboard-error-section/dashboard-error-section.component.ts (3)
134-134: Verify MappingService method signature.
The service call now includes additional parameters (this.appName and this.detailAccountType). Let's ensure the service method signature has been updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I found the service method signature in src/app/core/services/common/mapping.service.ts:
Service method signature is compatible with the new parameters
The getPaginatedDestinationAttributes method in the mapping service already accepts all the required parameters:
getPaginatedDestinationAttributes(
attributeType: string,
value?: string,
display_name?: string,
appName?: string,
detailed_accout_type?: string[],
categories?: string[]
)The service call is correctly using these optional parameters in the order they are defined.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify MappingService method signature
# Search for the method definition to ensure it accepts the new parameters
ast-grep --pattern 'getPaginatedDestinationAttributes($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the service method
# First, let's locate the mapping service file
fd "mapping.service.ts"
# Then we'll use ripgrep to search for the method with context
rg "getPaginatedDestinationAttributes" -A 5
Length of output: 43212
162-162: Verify simplified CATEGORY handling.
The conditional logic for CATEGORY source field has been simplified. Let's ensure this doesn't impact existing functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Looking at the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have enough context. The code shows that the simplification is actually part of a well-structured conditional logic where groupedDestinationResponse.ACCOUNT is the correct assignment when the source field is 'CATEGORY' and the destination field is not 'EXPENSE_TYPE'. The previous implementation appears in the search results and follows the same logic.
Simplification of CATEGORY handling is correct
The simplified assignment maintains the required functionality as it's part of a proper conditional block that handles different source fields appropriately:
- For 'EMPLOYEE' source field → assigns EMPLOYEE/VENDOR options
- For 'CATEGORY' source field:
- If destination is 'EXPENSE_TYPE' → assigns EXPENSE_TYPE options
- Otherwise → assigns ACCOUNT options (our case)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify CATEGORY source field handling
# Search for related tests and implementations
# Check for tests related to CATEGORY handling
rg -A 5 "sourceField.*CATEGORY.*ACCOUNT"
# Check for similar patterns in other components
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($source === "CATEGORY") {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the context better
# Search for CATEGORY usage in the component and related files
rg -l "CATEGORY" src/
# Look for destination options handling
rg -A 5 "destinationOptions.*=.*ACCOUNT"
# Check for any tests related to dashboard-error-section
fd "dashboard-error-section.*spec"
# Search for groupedDestinationResponse usage
rg -A 3 "groupedDestinationResponse"
Length of output: 7595
128-132:
Fix syntax error and verify QBD_DIRECT condition.
There's a missing semicolon at line 131. Additionally, let's verify that this QBD_DIRECT-specific condition aligns with the intended behavior.
Fix the syntax error:
- this.detailAccountType = undefined
+ this.detailAccountType = undefined;Let's verify the QBD_DIRECT account handling:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the usage of detailAccountType and the relationship between QBD Direct and account types.
Let me check one more aspect to understand the complete flow of detailAccountType in the mapping service.
Based on the gathered evidence, I can now provide the final response:
The QBD_DIRECT account handling implementation is correct and verified.
The code follows the established pattern where:
detailAccountTypeis properly used as a parameter ingetPaginatedDestinationAttributesservice calls- QBD Direct components specifically handle
AccountingField.ACCOUNTwith chart of accounts data - The implementation aligns with both the generic mapping table and QBD-specific mapping components
The only issue is the missing semicolon, which should be fixed:
- this.detailAccountType = undefined
+ this.detailAccountType = undefined;🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify QBD_DIRECT account handling implementation
# Search for similar patterns to ensure consistency
# Check for other QBD_DIRECT specific handling
rg -A 5 "AppName.QBD_DIRECT.*AccountingField.ACCOUNT"
# Check chartOfAccounts usage
ast-grep --pattern 'this.chartOfAccounts'
Length of output: 833
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check detailAccountType usage and related patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'this.detailAccountType'
# Check for AccountingField.ACCOUNT usage in QBD components
rg "AccountingField.ACCOUNT" src/app/integrations/qbd-direct/
# Look for destination field handling in QBD components
rg -A 3 "destinationField.*=.*ACCOUNT" src/app/integrations/qbd-direct/
Length of output: 1385
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check mapping service implementation for destination attributes
rg -A 5 "getPaginatedDestinationAttributes.*detailAccountType"
# Look for the complete implementation of getDestinationOptionsV1
ast-grep --pattern 'getDestinationOptionsV1() {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3078
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 131-132: Missing semicolon.
(semi)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 131-131:
Missing semicolon
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/app/shared/components/configuration/configuration-select-field/configuration-select-field.component.html (1)
100-101: Consider extracting complex condition to component method.The conditional logic for displaying auto-selection messages is becoming complex. Consider moving this logic to the component class for better maintainability.
Example refactor:
// In component class isDefaultAutoSelectMessage(): boolean { return !((this.formControllerName === 'reimbursableExportGroup' || this.formControllerName === 'creditCardExportGroup') && this.appName === AppName.QBD_DIRECT && this.form.controls.creditCardExportType.value !== 'CREDIT_CARD_PURCHASE' && this.form.controls.reimbursableExportType.value !== 'BILL'); }Then in template:
-<span *ngIf="!((formControllerName === 'reimbursableExportGroup' || formControllerName === 'creditCardExportGroup') && appName === AppName.QBD_DIRECT && form.controls.creditCardExportType.value !== 'CREDIT_CARD_PURCHASE' && form.controls.reimbursableExportType.value !== 'BILL')"> +<span *ngIf="isDefaultAutoSelectMessage()">
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
src/app/core/models/qbd-direct/qbd-direct-configuration/qbd-direct-import-settings.model.ts(1 hunks)src/app/integrations/qbd-direct/qbd-direct-shared/qbd-direct-export-settings/qbd-direct-export-settings.component.html(1 hunks)src/app/shared/components/configuration/configuration-import-field/configuration-import-field.component.html(1 hunks)src/app/shared/components/configuration/configuration-select-field/configuration-select-field.component.html(1 hunks)src/app/shared/components/dashboard/dashboard-error-section/dashboard-error-section.component.ts(2 hunks)
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (2)
- src/app/integrations/qbd-direct/qbd-direct-shared/qbd-direct-export-settings/qbd-direct-export-settings.component.html
- src/app/shared/components/configuration/configuration-import-field/configuration-import-field.component.html
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/app/core/models/qbd-direct/qbd-direct-configuration/qbd-direct-import-settings.model.ts (1)
39-39: LGTM! Good improvement in null safety.
The change from potential null to empty array [] for importCodeFields is a safer approach that prevents null pointer issues and follows TypeScript best practices.
src/app/shared/components/dashboard/dashboard-error-section/dashboard-error-section.component.ts (2)
128-134: LGTM! Clean implementation of QBD Direct account type handling.
The addition of QBD Direct specific logic for setting detailAccountType follows the existing pattern and maintains consistency with other application-specific handling.
162-162: LGTM! Good simplification of category handling.
The removal of redundant conditional logic for the CATEGORY source field improves code readability without affecting functionality.
|
* dashboard error section fixes * dashboard error section fixes * configuration fixes --------- Co-authored-by: Ashwin Thanaraj <[email protected]>
Description
fix: dashboard error section fixes
Clickup
https://app.clickup.com
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
[appName]attribute to various configuration select fields for improved contextual information.