Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIO-9465: fix conditionals path for panel component #207

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Maria-Golomb
Copy link
Contributor

@Maria-Golomb Maria-Golomb commented Dec 20, 2024

Link to Jira Ticket

https://formio.atlassian.net/browse/FIO-9465

Description

Fixed path generation (for scope.conditionals) during conditional processing.
The changes allow avoiding the clearing of req.data for situations when wizard form have panels with specified conditionals relying on a component within the form. Unnecessary data clearing couses problems in the validation process of nested forms.

How has this PR been tested?

autotests
manually

Checklist:

  • I have completed the above PR template
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable)
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • My changes include tests that prove my fix is effective (or that my feature works as intended)
  • New and existing unit/integration tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have corresponding PRs that are listed above

@Maria-Golomb Maria-Golomb changed the title FIO-9485: fix conditionals path for panel component FIO-9465: fix conditionals path for panel component Dec 20, 2024
@@ -93,7 +93,10 @@ export const conditionalProcess = (context: ConditionsContext, isHidden: Conditi
}
let conditionalComp = scope.conditionals.find((cond) => cond.path === path);
if (!conditionalComp) {
conditionalComp = { path, conditionallyHidden: false };
conditionalComp = {
Copy link
Contributor

@brendanbond brendanbond Dec 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

something seems fishy to me about this change. Why wouldn't one of the new pathing options work here for Panel? (i.e. fullPath or fullDataPath etc.)? Can you explain your reasoning here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants