Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NEW: @W-15884203@: Implement the retire-js engine #23
NEW: @W-15884203@: Implement the retire-js engine #23
Changes from 6 commits
5e2f6fd
00c6dc3
33ec286
42d8f57
28dd5da
eba6c84
5a495eb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some places you call this method and in other places, you directly use the RetireJsEngine.NAME. Is that intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
getName is the only way the core module gets the engine name. The only other place I call getName here in this project is when testing that getName returns the expected name. Otherwise, I only use the constant. This indeed is intentional. In those other instances where I use the constant, I don't have an instance of the engine in order to call getName anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this something we introduced in 5.x or is this the same strategy currently followed by sfdx-scanner?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No this is exactly what our current strategy with 4.x is. This is what makes our retire-js engine more complicated... because we have to do all this advanced stuff.