Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

UIPCIR-77: Jest/RTL: Cover CirculationNoteFields component with unit tests #206

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

UIPCIR-77: Jest/RTL: Cover CirculationNoteFields component with unit tests #206

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

mariia-aloshyna
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Jest Unit Test Statistics

64 tests  +6   64 ✔️ +6   1m 2s ⏱️ ±0s
16 suites +1     0 💤 ±0 
  1 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 62f02a8. ± Comparison against base commit b8b7c2b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@mariia-aloshyna mariia-aloshyna merged commit b672dbf into master Nov 19, 2024
5 checks passed
@mariia-aloshyna mariia-aloshyna deleted the UIPCIR-77 branch November 19, 2024 13:39
mariia-aloshyna added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
@mariia-aloshyna
UIPCIR-77: Jest/RTL: Cover CirculationNoteFields component with unit …
4eae483 
…tests (#206)

(cherry picked from commit b672dbf)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vashjs vashjs vashjs approved these changes

@OleksandrHladchenko1 OleksandrHladchenko1 OleksandrHladchenko1 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@mariia-aloshyna @OleksandrHladchenko1 @vashjs