Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix bloc pattern article link #4253

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

robsonsilv4
Copy link
Contributor

Status

READY

Breaking Changes

NO

Description

This PR fixes the BloC pattern article link referenced in package:bloc README.

Type of Change

  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🧹 Code refactor
  • ✅ Build configuration change
  • 📝 Documentation
  • 🗑️ Chore

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (9bf190e) to head (b0a4ef4).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #4253   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           31        31           
  Lines          803       803           
=========================================
  Hits           803       803           
Flag Coverage Δ
bloc 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@felangel
Copy link
Owner

felangel commented Oct 2, 2024

I tried to address this as part of 5a80a9a.

Thanks for the contribution!

@felangel felangel closed this Oct 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants