Test for falco -h and falco --help commands

[GLVSKiriti]

This is part of #7

Command: -h and --help

[poiana]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: GLVSKiriti
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign andreagit97 for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[poiana]

Welcome @GLVSKiriti! It looks like this is your first PR to falcosecurity/testing 🎉

[GLVSKiriti]

@leogr @jasondellaluce Here I tested whether all shorthand flags are printing on console when we run falco -h or falco --help

Is this enough or should I also add assertions for every flag like --dry-run, --unbuffered etc..

[GLVSKiriti]

As -h and --help commands produces same outputs. I tested both commands in the same PR.

Any feedback on this PR 👀👀?

[leogr]

/assign

[poiana]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community.

/lifecycle stale

[leogr]

/remove-lifecycle stale
@GLVSKiriti could you rebase this PR pls?

Also, I believe the output of Falco has changed.

[poiana]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community.

/lifecycle stale

[leogr]

/remove-lifecycle stale