-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #194 #195
Fix #194 #195
Conversation
Looking at the code, I think it should work. I guess we should try to release a beta version this time and ask people having the issue with the upgrade to comment if that helps them or not. Either by fixing the problem or helping troubleshoot the problem :) |
I think this fixes a rendering issue we’re having with our recent merge at Demetrix... |
Hi @GBirkel! Please note that unfortunately this is not a "fix", just a way to fail fast and warn the user. If you're having problems maybe it's safer to go back to Fable.React 5.x. @MangelMaxime Should we unlist the 6.x package if users seem to be having issues? |
@alfonsogarciacaro I don't know in general I don't like the unlisting package but if that avoid problem perhaps we should. Also, now it has been out for several days/weeks so perhaps it is too late? Releasing this new fast failing would help people make the transition should be enough in theory no? |
With standard nuget unlisted packages are still installed if they are the
latest. It's a bug that they won't fix. So you always need to Unlist + push
a new one
Maxime Mangel <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa., 16. Mai 2020,
18:47:
… @alfonsogarciacaro <https://github.com/alfonsogarciacaro> I don't know in
general I don't like the unlisting package but if that avoid problem
perhaps we should.
Also, now it has been out for several days/weeks so perhaps it is too late?
Release this new fast failing would help people make the transition should
be enough in theory no?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#195 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAOANAWGBMJASI2RL3PJ5LRR27SBANCNFSM4M352OSA>
.
|
@alfonsogarciacaro Should we release this new version? |
Ok, this is my new attempt to fix the
FunctionComponent.Of
API #188 #194. To make sure users are always passing the same render function to eachFunctionComponent.Of
I'm storing a stringified version of the function in the cache and compare it with newly passed render arguments. Seems to work but please someone give it a try to double check. I'm doing this only in Debug mode to avoid the overhead in production. I hope it's enough but let me know what you think.This PR also updates npm dependencies to remove the security warnings (there's still one about yargs-parser when running
npm audit
that I couldn't solve).