Refactor proofs contracts to allow reusing contract implementations #153
+25
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ControlCplusControlV
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR aims to flatten the constructor arguments in
DisputeGame.solso it uses just ProxyWithImmutableArgs rather than Immutable + Immutable variables in its constructor, allowing different factories to all point to the same implementationTests
No tests needed for the design doc
Additional context
Currently we need to re-deploy the
DisputeGame.solimplementation the factory uses for each new rollup due to its immutable constructor arguments, this PR aims to fix that.Metadata