Content tag merge upstream main 2024 11 12 #5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e inlining property access (swc-project#9507) **Related issue:** - Closes swc-project#9498
**Related issue:** - Closes swc-project#9494 - babel/babel#16194
**Related issue:** Closes swc-project#9453
**Related issue:** - Closes swc-project#9531
…swc-project#9530) Closes swc-project#9500 Caused by https://github.com/swc-project/swc/blob/c7fdd6b69b129a11465125d4e11a898326b7e884/crates/swc_ecma_minifier/src/compress/pure/misc.rs#L1547. When the object with getters pass to `self.ignore_return_value`, https://github.com/swc-project/swc/blob/c7fdd6b69b129a11465125d4e11a898326b7e884/crates/swc_ecma_minifier/src/compress/pure/misc.rs#L966 converts the object to `0` because the object is side-effect-free according to https://github.com/swc-project/swc/blob/c7fdd6b69b129a11465125d4e11a898326b7e884/crates/swc_ecma_utils/src/lib.rs#L1496 We should skip this process to fix the issue. As is known only accessing getters and setters may cause side effect, we can safely do the transformation when none of them appears in the object. More precision is possible if comparing the lit prop names. I also collect computed keys of getters and setters in the object, is there any bad case? The reason why only numeric (string) key removes the statement is that string key (`Computed`) is converted to `Ident` in other phases, e.g. `{}['a']` => `{}.a`, which does not matching the pattern.
**Related issue:** - Closes swc-project#9527
…cy decorators (swc-project#9535) **Related issue:** - Closes swc-project#9429
**Related issue:** - Closes swc-project#9719
…ct#9729) **Related issue:** - Closes swc-project#7602
**Related issue:** - Closes swc-project#9716 --------- Co-authored-by: OJ Kwon <[email protected]>
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [allocator-api2](https://redirect.github.com/zakarumych/allocator-api2) | workspace.dependencies | patch | `0.2.18` -> `0.2.19` | | [libfuzzer-sys](https://redirect.github.com/rust-fuzz/libfuzzer) | dependencies | patch | `0.4.7` -> `0.4.8` | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>rust-fuzz/libfuzzer (libfuzzer-sys)</summary> ### [`v0.4.8`](https://redirect.github.com/rust-fuzz/libfuzzer/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#048) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/rust-fuzz/libfuzzer/compare/0.4.7...0.4.8) Released 2024-11-07. ##### Added - Bindings to `LLVMFuzzerCustomCrossOver` through the `fuzz_crossover` macro. See the `example_crossover` directory in this crate's repo for a complete example. ##### Changed - Updated to `libFuzzer` commit `ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99` (`release/19.x`). *** </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 👻 **Immortal**: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get [config help](https://redirect.github.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions) if that's undesired. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR was generated by [Mend Renovate](https://mend.io/renovate/). View the [repository job log](https://developer.mend.io/github/swc-project/swc). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzOS43LjEiLCJ1cGRhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzOS43LjEiLCJ0YXJnZXRCcmFuY2giOiJtYWluIiwibGFiZWxzIjpbXX0=--> Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…9732) **Description:** This reverts commit 772f023. **Related issue:** - Reverts swc-project#9717
**Related issue:** - Reverts swc-project#9732 - Reverts swc-project#9731 - Reverts swc-project#9730
…9734) **Description:** `declare const MY_MAGIC_VARIABLE: string` is not a variable declaration. **Related issue:** - vercel/next.js#72576
…tream-main-2024-11-12
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
branch created with
I feel like git merging is weird, so this PR (for reference)
#6
was immensely helpful, as there was code left in from the original
mainthat didn't get removed when merging in the up to datemain.