Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing "algorithm" field to the trust-ca object #1304

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2019

Conversation

ctron
Copy link
Contributor

@ctron ctron commented Jun 19, 2019

Currently we are missing the field "algorithm" in the trust anchor configuration of the tenant.

@ctron ctron added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Jun 19, 2019
@ctron ctron requested a review from sophokles73 June 19, 2019 15:44
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2019

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@95e1a65). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1304   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   68.59%           
  Complexity        ?      389           
=========================================
  Files             ?      289           
  Lines             ?    13240           
  Branches          ?     1148           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     9082           
  Misses            ?     3343           
  Partials          ?      815

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 95e1a65...154fd54. Read the comment docs.

@ctron ctron force-pushed the feature/amend_spec_1 branch from 38f4e23 to 154fd54 Compare June 21, 2019 09:20
@ctron ctron merged commit 25eda85 into eclipse-hono:master Jun 21, 2019
@ctron ctron deleted the feature/amend_spec_1 branch June 21, 2019 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants