Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance nested serializer handling by skipping write_only fields. #100

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

CorneiZeR
Copy link
Contributor

I noticed that my write_only fields were trying to render in the final excel. This fix should solve that problem. Also couldn't resist leaving the docstring.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 15, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@fe9047c). Learn more about missing BASE report.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #100   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   93.18%           
=======================================
  Files           ?        4           
  Lines           ?      352           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?      328           
  Misses          ?       24           
  Partials        ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@browniebroke
Copy link
Member

Nice one, do you think you could try to update our test suite accordingly? Thanks

@CorneiZeR
Copy link
Contributor Author

@browniebroke Done. Bizarre behavior from ruff :)

@browniebroke
Copy link
Member

Bizarre behavior from ruff :)

Yes, that's the isort rule I believe

@FlipperPA FlipperPA merged commit 63c0ac7 into django-commons:main Oct 18, 2024
6 checks passed
@FlipperPA
Copy link
Member

@CorneiZeR Thank you! We'll get this pressed in our next release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants