Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PECO-840] Port staging ingestion behaviour to new UC Volumes #235

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Sep 30, 2023
Merged

Conversation

susodapop
Copy link
Contributor

@susodapop susodapop commented Sep 29, 2023

⚠️ Note to reviewers: this will be easiest to review commit-by-commit as each change is small and logical. All these tests are copied from the original staging locations feature and only lightly augmented to support UC volumes.

Description

Last year we introduced staging locations, a feature which is being phased out with UC volumes instead. No change is needed to the connector except to update our e2e tests to use the new UC volumes syntax. Which is what this pull request implements. I originally wrote this change in July 2023, as the feature was first rolling out and we didn't have a server to test against. We now have that server and I have verified that all our tests pass.

Related Tickets & Documents

This is a reopen of #234 and #167

Jesse Whitehouse added 11 commits July 1, 2023 12:14
Prior to this change, the test would pass for _any_ failure. This was
an oversight when writing the tests originally.

Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <[email protected]>

Fix broken test: we need to place files into the e2etests subdirectory

Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <[email protected]>
staging locations but UC volumes dooes not have personal staging locations.

Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <[email protected]>
is different than was PSL

Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <[email protected]>
@susodapop
Copy link
Contributor Author

I synced with main to fix the merge conflict warning.

Copy link
Contributor

@nithinkdb nithinkdb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Signed-off-by: Jesse Whitehouse <[email protected]>
@susodapop susodapop merged commit 13cb417 into main Sep 30, 2023
@susodapop susodapop deleted the PECO-840 branch October 3, 2023 18:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants