Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a new component test plugin: cypress-rspack-dev-server #5589

Closed

Conversation

xfsnowind
Copy link
Contributor

Add a new component test plugin: cypress-rspack-dev-server

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 26, 2023

👷 Deploy request for cypress-docs pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5f07e35

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 26, 2023

Deploy Preview for benevolent-cat-040f48 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5f07e35
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/benevolent-cat-040f48/deploys/658a99302eb208000891dc5f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-5589--benevolent-cat-040f48.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


joseph.feng seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@cypress-app-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@xfsnowind xfsnowind closed this Dec 26, 2023
@xfsnowind xfsnowind deleted the plugins/cypress-rspack-dev-server branch December 26, 2023 09:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants