Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update cuenca-validations #406

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

update cuenca-validations #406

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

felipao-mx
Copy link
Member

@felipao-mx felipao-mx commented Jul 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated version from 1.0.1 to 1.0.2.
    • Upgraded cuenca-validations dependency to version 0.11.30.
    • Ensured compatibility with older Python versions by adjusting the dataclasses requirement.

@felipao-mx felipao-mx requested a review from alexviquez as a code owner July 17, 2024 00:48
@felipao-mx felipao-mx requested review from pachCode and rogelioLpz and removed request for alexviquez July 17, 2024 00:48
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Walkthrough

This update primarily consists of version adjustments. The cuenca/version.py file was updated from version '1.0.1' to '1.0.2', impacting the __version__ and CLIENT_VERSION variables. Additionally, the requirements.txt file reflects an upgrade of the cuenca-validations package and an updated minimum version requirement for dataclasses to ensure compatibility with Python versions earlier than 3.7.

Changes

Files Change Summary
cuenca/version.py Updated __version__ from '1.0.1' to '1.0.2'; CLIENT_VERSION reflects the updated version.
requirements.txt Upgraded cuenca-validations from 0.11.29 to 0.11.30; updated dataclasses requirement to 0.7+.

Poem

In the code's quiet night, a version upped its flight,
From 1.0.1 to .2, it took a gentle stride so true.
Requirements changed with glee, validations now 0.11.30,
To dataclasses we did cheer, compatibility made clear.
A hop, a skip, a digital delight, let's celebrate this update tonight! 🎉


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f72af7 and 72f9f3a.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • cuenca/version.py (1 hunks)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
cuenca/version.py (2)

1-1: Version update approved.

The update of __version__ from '1.0.1' to '1.0.2' is correctly implemented.


1-3: Consistency Check: CLIENT_VERSION and API_VERSION

CLIENT_VERSION correctly mirrors the updated __version__, and API_VERSION remains unchanged as expected.

requirements.txt (2)

2-2: Package version update approved.

The update of cuenca-validations from version 0.11.29 to 0.11.30 is correctly implemented.


2-3: Compatibility Update for dataclasses

The specification for dataclasses ensures compatibility with Python versions earlier than 3.7. This is a proactive change to maintain compatibility and prevent runtime issues.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (6f72af7) to head (72f9f3a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #406   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           49        49           
  Lines         1111      1111           
=========================================
  Hits          1111      1111           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
cuenca/version.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6f72af7...72f9f3a. Read the comment docs.

@felipao-mx felipao-mx merged commit b602497 into main Jul 17, 2024
16 checks passed
@felipao-mx felipao-mx deleted the inactive-users branch July 17, 2024 01:01
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants