-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement inactive user management #713
Conversation
94786ab
to
df76009
Compare
75d2ec3
to
5dbcc51
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are linting and formatting errors reported by: python -m flake8
(see README.md how to run)
What could help to get the action running: a --dry-run flag that just logs what would be done (existing logging might be good enough) and the lets the python script fails so that the PR is not created.
Thanks for the feedback! I implemented a |
5e05bcd
to
88e4131
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there already a dry-run of the new workflow?
Is it really possible to trigger it "as part on a PR", i.e. with modifications in the github action itself?
549f398
to
7fc310e
Compare
The users returned by Github and listed in our contributors.yml are not equal regarding case sensitivity. That is why a case insensitive comparison is required.
The latest run is available in #736. I had to fix two small things but nothing changed in the behaviour and the run looks good. I'm going to merge this. |
This pr aim is to implement the RFC described in #707