Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: upgrade to storybook 7.x #1726
chore: upgrade to storybook 7.x #1726
Changes from 3 commits
a89347e
05d0836
2fc59cf
1ec3ea0
655a8c9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I notice some usages of
generateSnapshots
requireas StoryFile
and others don't, do you know what's happening here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not exactly sure, but it could be the type changes related to some of the storybook libraries. The first sweep was to satisfy typescript to restore parity on
yarn test
, and we can see if something systematic is causing certain story files to need a typeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do these events have to be wrapped in
act
, how'd you come to realize this?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
after upgrading dependencies,
yarn test
would output gigantic errors in console. what's strange is that for some of these user events, if you add theact()
around them, it will complain that it's redundant 👎For whatever reason, not all
user.
calls need this, and on older versions of the libraries, none did. It doesnt make obvious sense which is which