This repository has been archived by the owner on May 22, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
[terra-functional-testing] Fixing Nexus screenshot bugs #839
Merged
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d020533
fixes for upload/download to deal with multinode jenkins runs
BenBoersma d7f55d2
final changes
BenBoersma 5ab36cd
accidently removed logger line, readding it
BenBoersma 30af124
fixing lint and adding jest tests
BenBoersma d1195e5
adding changelog and fixing linter errors
BenBoersma 52318ac
Merge branch 'main' into functional-testing-debug
BenBoersma 0f73f13
fixing falsy function call for making reference name
BenBoersma cef7d30
Merge branch 'functional-testing-debug' of github.com:cerner/terra-to…
BenBoersma 3b352ec
moving off sync functions in async oncomplete
BenBoersma 0fb4acd
fixing lint error
BenBoersma e3f1c35
Used better testing methods and changed wdioterraservice to test new …
BenBoersma 8bbf50a
Update CHANGELOG.md
sdadn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Is it possible to turn this into an
async
function? the Sync API from node is infamous for being a blocking API (meaning that it needs to wait for this to complete before doing anything else in node). This will affect performance down the road, especially when we change this to run multiple suites at a time. I might suggest using the equivalent promises API's from node: https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v14.x/api/fs.html#fs_promises_apiThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know if it is possible, at the very least I have a suspicion that would be a major version bump since we would be changing a main testing function to be
async
when it wasn't before.