-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
Conversation
- Validated/updated all links out to HL7 websites. - yaml file had a lot of examples of double forward-slashes - Validated API behavior matches stated specifications. - Updated Overview Paragraph. - Uppercase'd returned fields list. - Parameter Table and Implementation Notes updates to match current guidelines. - Implementation Notes under the Create section modified to match current guidelines. - Anonymized opc-request-id and X-Request-Id values added for response to Create section. - Added backticks to quite a few elements that should be code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PRODOC-203512: Approved for style and formatting.
|
||
The following [HL7® FHIR® US Core Implementation Guide STU 4.0.0](https://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/STU4/){:target="_blank"} Profiles are supported by this resource: | ||
This resource supports the following [HL7 FHIR US Core Implementation Guide STU 4.0.0](https://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/STU4/){:target="_blank"} profiles: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this change violates the HL7 trademark usage policy. we need to add back the trademark registration mark.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to our style guide, we do not use any trademark symbols in our product labeling documentation. This has always been the case when referencing HL7 or FHIR.
Per Oracle guidelines, we do need to include the supplier name before the trademarked term for every reference, but omitting the symbols still applies.
Updated section examples for you @amcginn |
the last screenshot is... weird that it links only two of them. since we do want those links referenced elsewhere, should we add links to the others? |
I'm going to adjust the list so it doesn't trip up the table generator like it did. |
* Updated MedicationAdminstration R4 Resource (#1010) * Updated MedicationAdministration DSTU2 Resource (#1011) * Review and Updates to Goal (#1027) * Review and Updates to Communication (#1022) * dstu2 Practitioner updates (#1014) * R4 Practitioner updates (#1015) * Person updates for DSTU2 and R4 (#1009) * StructureDefinition updates (#1012) * Updated Medication Order DSTU2 Resource (#1020) * Updated MedicationStatement DSTU2 Resource (#1021) * Updated MedicationRequest R4 Resource (#1019) * Updated Provenance R4 Resource (#1018) * DSTU 2 Patient updates (#1023) * R4 Patient formatting and standard updates (#1028) * R4 Observation,DocumentReference Documentation Updates (#1031) * R4 Encounter Period StartDateTime Sort Update (#1033) * updated Location type search parameter and examples for physicalType (#1034) * [R4][DiagnosticReport][DocumentReference] support search by _lastUpdated (#1032) * [R4][Immunization] Support search by _lastUpdated (#1029) * R4 Binary Autogen CCD add encounter parameter (#1035) * [R4][Immunization] Documentation Update (#1036)
Several formatting updates in this one, and re-wording of sections to be more descriptive and in a similar style to other resources that were recently updated.
Validated that API calls behave as expected with both the expected and unexpected parameters.
Description
PR Checklist
Old Overview and Fields:
New Overview and Fields:
Old Parameters:
New Parameters:
Old Create Notes:
New Create Notes:
Old Create response:
New Create response: