Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add "parallel channels" scenario #7

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

C-Otto
Copy link
Contributor

@C-Otto C-Otto commented May 24, 2022

Both lnd and lnd-manageJ try to send the full amount first, then split (which succeeds).

@C-Otto C-Otto marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2022 14:28
@C-Otto
Copy link
Contributor Author

C-Otto commented May 24, 2022

This might be more interesting with a parallel channel that is not announced. However, lnd-manageJ would not attempt another payment. This might be what lnd is doing, though (see our discussion in #2).

@joostjager
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, probably useful to have a private boolean in graph.yml on the channel level

@joostjager
Copy link
Contributor

Added private field in #8

Do you want to extend the parallels scenario with this?

@C-Otto C-Otto force-pushed the parallel-channels branch from f6d8796 to 1384e4a Compare May 31, 2022 20:04
@C-Otto
Copy link
Contributor Author

C-Otto commented May 31, 2022

I added the "private" scenario in addition. Note that lnd-manageJ isn't able to find a successful route in this scenario.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants