Fixed two typos #33
Open
Fixed two typos #33
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I think I found two typos: 1) In the paragraph starting at line 814, it seems that you first refer to a function as g, then change it to f. Since the notation keeps referring to f, I changed the g for f in lines 815 and 816. 2) At line 844, the formula refers to entirely negative regions, but the indicator function evaluated at entirely positive ones. I changed the sign.
Fixed two typos
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think I found two typos:
In the paragraph starting at line 814, it seems that you first refer to a function as g, then change it to f. Since the notation keeps referring to f, I changed the g for f in lines 815 and 816.
At line 844, the formula refers to entirely negative regions, but the indicator function evaluated at entirely positive ones. I changed the sign.